The offense does put up a lot of points and it will here. At the end of the year, our offensive stats will look great.
Heupel himself said he reinvented his offense after Oklahoma. What they were doing in Norman was what Stoops and Jay Norvell wanted to run. So you have to look at everything after 2014.
If you look from 2015 forward, this offense has a consistent pattern: put up points on bad teams, get shut down by good teams.
2015 (at Utah State so there are some talent disparities): 12 points vs. Southern Utah, 14 points vs. Utah, 17 points vs. Washington, 14 points vs. San Diego State, 13 points vs. New Mexico
2016 at Missouri: 11vs. West Virginia, 7 vs. LSU, 14 vs. Florida, 21 vs. Kentucky, 26 vs. Vanderbilt
2017 at Missouri: 13 vs. South Carolina, 3 vs. Purdue, 14 vs. Auburn - the offense took off later in the year and I will acknowledge it, but they didn't beat any good teams.
I've seen the argument that we need to crawl before we can walk, and putting up points against bad teams will be fun and at least make us worth watching. I agree with those things, but we're going to have a similar issue that Pruitt had where we are totally noncompetitive vs. the Big 3 and eventually, people will get tired of it.
What would you consider similar success?
Missouri was 4-8 in 2016 and 7-6 in 2017, and that was with notoriously good defensive coach Barry Odom running the defense.