Weezer
VolNation Dalai Lama , VN Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 86,100
- Likes
- 252,313
If what Swanson posted is true that JH wants Conklin and DW wants others, and we end up hiring Conklin... does the board self explode? Do we have a moment of hope, or do we immediately begin hating the hire? I just need to get prepared.
How’s that an overreaction?And the difference between have a DC a couple days ago vs a couple days from now will make LOTS of difference in these relationships that we have not been able to form yet? As usual, we overreact to everything.
Welllllllll, once you bring some facts into it.Getting Shannon to take a lateral move positionwise from Florida was also widely considered a home run. And honestly this year is the only year it was really bad. Due mostly to how many players he lost from opt outs, injuries and suspensions. Not having any depth is magnified when you face the 6th most plays per game in the nation. The first 2 seasons with Shannon weren't all that bad when looking at it from a per play basis instead of total numbers.
DC name flow chart:
1. Confusion
2. Disappointment
3. Research
4. Buy-In
5. Optimism
6. Insiders: “we got him!”
7. Reporters: “you don’t got him.”
8. Disbelief
9. Depression
10. New Name (return to 1)
How’s that an overreaction?
Unless we look like world beaters, kids are going to commit to schools with coaches they’re familiar with & can win immediately vs as an entirely new staff staring NCAA sanctions in the eye.
Ty Simpson is the first example.
So, can we apply that same logic to your earlier post about "it's done" with the 3 little signed emojis?
There's a lie in there somewhere
So, can we apply that same logic to your earlier post about "it's done" with the 3 little signed emojis?
There's a lie in there somewhere
Sounds like Hubbs went waaaaay out on that limbIn the war room last night, Hubbs said that we’re squarely behind the 8 ball with the 22 class. Said a lot of kids want to make early decisions and we just don’t have enough time to build relationships there.
Obviously if we look good on the field this year, things could change.
Some of these unnamed sources are probably why our fanbase is considered "toxic" from the outside looking in.
They drop info to get our hopes up. We all lap it up. Then they drop in an anonymous tidbit telling us about a scenario that will obviously make us doubt the leadership. We are screwed.
We'll probably make a normal hire eventually and we'll write the narrative around it ourselves with some help from these "sources".
Some folks will hold onto that info and they will bring it up 2 years from now like it's fact. When in fact, we don't know anything that can be considered truth.
Rinse. Repeat.
I'm convinced the people benefitting from the clicks on websites like these is behind these "nuggets". It works like magic and lines their pockets. Follow the money. The more drama at Tennessee there is, the more money they make.
I have a feeling many of these "sources" realized how rich they could get after Kiffin left and engagement in spaces like this exploded.
Just my 2 cents. Take it all with a grain of salt.
I think you were duped by @Bassmaster_Vol when he changed his avatar to mine and made posts.So, can we apply that same logic to your earlier post about "it's done" with the 3 little signed emojis?
There's a lie in there somewhere
It is not a fact, no matter how bad you want it to be.He hired Randy Shannon for Heupel. That's a fact.
I'm not saying we know for sure this is happening here - we don't know it to be true, but past evidence says it *could* be.
But here would be my retort to your statement that Heupel wouldn't take the job if it were true:
1) $4M goes a long way, and we gave him a very long deal.
2) He was one subpar season away from being on the hot seat at UCF - especially with a new AD in town.
3) It does not have to be contentious that the AD wants a say on the construction of the football staff.