volsfan_17
Vol stuck in Ohio
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 1,233
- Likes
- 3,917
Hardly. I don't get why people think this. Maybe the all-SEC schedule was a shock to fans, but a bunch of SEC offenses absolutely ate last year and no OOC games meant no stat-stuffing games.
We gave up 30.1 ppg (all in-conference of course), that was good for top half of the SEC (#7 exactly). Considering the SEC is the cream of the crop, being 7th isn't too bad at all. 69th nationally which has us just hardly below the midway point.
Historically, despite SEC offenses being a lot better than a decade ago, last year's defense was 5th best of the last decade vs conference opponents ('19, '15, '14, '11 were better). The other 5 seasons we allowed to SEC teams:
2018 36.1 PPG
2017 34.8
2016 36.9
2013 30.6
2012 40.0
I just don't think, and stats support it, last year's defense was "bad". It was an unusual year with an insane schedule and, still yet, we were better than half of the league.
So serious question; do your stats provided account for the point off turnovers that our offense gave the opposing team? Because to frame it up like you have, means that it was almost impossible for us to have the record we did last year. It's an even bigger indictment on the QB and coaching staff.
So, for sake of argument, who did we lose on defense that we didn't adequately replace? Thompson was upgraded with the CB's (Hadden/Turnage) that were brought in because he played hurt all season, HT was replaced by a team leading tackler from Texas (Mitchell), traded Middleton for Terry, swapped out Crouch for Mohan (that's a push at worst), add in actual development from one of the best DL coaches in the country and we should see growth from Baron, Eason, Simmons, Thomas, Bailey and Bumphus. And actual LB coaches, not just show cause waiting to happen placeholders, and I'd argue that the defense will be even better than last year.
If that's the case, based on your numbers, then we'll be a top half SEC defense this season. GO VOLS!