Jackcrevol
Ain't Got Time!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Messages
- 67,196
- Likes
- 170,295
We’ll see how it works out for Comcast. Their official answer when asked about KUB bringing internet and TV to the market is “We welcome the competition”. I think $65 for symmetrical gig is a great price. I have no issues seeing competition in the market and consumers making their choice.'at a great price.'
Money grows on trees. Let the Gov't foot the bill. What happens when a public utility gets into the internet game?
Head ends are massively expensive to upkeep and maintain. The buildout is all done on grant moneys, footed by, you guessed it. Us.
Years from now, on a Gpon network - when ATT, Spectrum, Comcast, and Wow caught up with their own PON, and sell same thing with a for-profit head end. Municpalities will either be gobbled up, or, **** the bed.
Fwiw, fiber nodes are often split between ISP's in areas anyway. That hard to get to neighborhood is prob just borrowing ATT'a brand new $40 million dollar switch anyway.
That's a drop in the bucket...
FYI, BVU was a case study, literally on rural buildout.
BVU OptiNet officially acquired by Sunset Digital
Also, most of these muni's dont or cant afford their own Customer Service Dept's, or tech support. So, its outsourced to a YOU guessed it. For profit entity, local yocal not affiliated with the Utility.
I’ve got a headache, and can’t think it through, but theoretically, could a person have 12 credit cards, using one each month to pay off the previous month, acquiring points/miles/ etc at an artificial rate and just keep leveraging the debt for profit?
I’m on little sleep, no caffeine and sitting in an airport, so basically, someone just show me why this doesnt make sense
We paid for whole damn thing.We’ll see how it works out for Comcast. Their official answer when asked about KUB bringing internet and TV to the market is “We welcome the competition”. I think $65 for symmetrical gig is a great price. I have no issues seeing competition in the market and consumers making their choice.
Nebraska is a school that the sport has definitely passed by. I don't ever see them coming close to what they once were.
Many think Tennessee is in that same boat, but I don't. We still land elite players. We just need stability so we can stack several elite recruiting classes together. We have everything in place to be right in the thick of it again.
BTW, I don't think we can have this discussion since technically it's politics....
Nebraska is a school that the sport has definitely passed by. I don't ever see them coming close to what they once were.
Many think Tennessee is in that same boat, but I don't. We still land elite players. We just need stability so we can stack several elite recruiting classes together. We have everything in place to be right in the thick of it again.
I would fail one and three. I check my notifications and have no one on ignore. Oh well. Hopefully, I'll someday regain control of Tibet.I would base my VP choice on three criteria...
1. Number of ignored notifications. (If you don't ignore your notifications I don't think we would work well together)
2. Like to Post ratio. (I mean if it isn't at least 2:1 then you are probably going to drag me down in the polls.)
3. Who is on you ignore list. (Without a robust ignore list then all the troll activity will mess with our Tennessee First agenda. I can't have that.)