2015 and 2016, man...
Ive wondered about this a lot from a statistical sense: How do you handicap coaching relative to talent? Dave Bartoo and other folks have all of these complex ways of doing it, but Im skeptical. I think theyre probably over-fitting their models and then selling ADs on results that dont have good year-over-year predictive value.
My hunch - good coaching can get you a game or two above what your pre-season talent would predict. On the other hand, bad coaching can cost you a lot more games. In other words, coaching has a much lower floor than ceiling. I think a good part of this is the ability of a bad coach to either not play, or misuse talent is so costly. Its more devastating over the long haul, and the past couple of drafts have shown us how f@&$ing bad the last staff was at putting players in a position to succeed.
I wonder how much money Butch has cost these players.