Recruiting Forum Football Talk V

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what the committee is saying, if Tennessee and LSU win out (tcu loses among the way), there will be 3 teams in the playoff lol
 
So what the committee is saying, if Tennessee and LSU win out (tcu loses among the way), there will be 3 teams in the playoff lol
They were saying let your imagination run wild because OSU/Mich will have a loser, TCU and USC could still lose, and LSU is not beating UGA. The only one standing on their resume is Tennessee so let everyone else impress. Seriously. Aside from "but wait, what if!" scenarios, they all looked good with Tennessee tagging in after someone falls.
 
Some were worried about ESPN trying to find ways to keep Vols out but I just saw them roll the red carpet out
Top ratings does that for you.

And yeah, talking about us running up the score, (with our backups and freshmen) but no word when Ohio State did the same with Mr Heisman still in.. Annoying. At least they seem to think we are in when Michigan/Ohio state lose, and don't expect LSU to jump us, even with a win over Georgia. If Bama and LSU keep winning, no way any other team can overcome our resume. (obviously we have to win the next two games-- not overlooking anything)
 
It should be 100% apparent that no teams from the ACC or PAC 12 should be in the Playoff.
USC is about to play UCLA and Norte Dame. If they beat both and then win the pac 12, they will be in. If Clemson wins out and then beats an 11-1 NC in the ACC championship, who knows what the committee would do there, tho they wouldn’t deserve it.

at the very least we need TCU to lose because Michigan and TCU would then drop out. So even if USC is in, we will be too
 
I appreciate Rece Davis and his support, but I just cannot see a scenario where if LSU gets a fluke win over Georgia and is the conference champion that they DON’T leapfrog us. Call it BVS or whatever you want, but it feels unrealistic that the committee will set the precedent of including 2 teams from the same conference in the playoffs and neither of those 2 teams won the conference.

It might lessen our resume slightly, but I’m not so sure we shouldn’t be rooting for A&M next week to upset LSU just in case Georgia lays a massive egg. In that scenario, there is no debate. A 3-loss LSU isn’t getting in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: berryvol
I appreciate Rece Davis and his support, but I just cannot see a scenario where if LSU gets a fluke win over Georgia and is the conference champion that they DON’T leapfrog us. Call it BVS or whatever you want, but it feels unrealistic that the committee will set the precedent of including 2 teams from the same conference in the playoffs and neither of those 2 teams won the conference.

It might lessen our resume slightly, but I’m not so sure we shouldn’t be rooting for A&M next week to upset LSU just in case Georgia lays a massive egg. In thay scenario, there is no debate. A 3-loss LSU isn’t getting in.

I would be flabbergasted. A team with 2 losses would jump a team that blasted it on its home field. If that happened, then there is no more talk of teams “deciding it on the field.”

The head of the committee has made reference to our offensive numbers, and I believe our exciting brand also favors us.
 
I appreciate Rece Davis and his support, but I just cannot see a scenario where if LSU gets a fluke win over Georgia and is the conference champion that they DON’T leapfrog us. Call it BVS or whatever you want, but it feels unrealistic that the committee will set the precedent of including 2 teams from the same conference in the playoffs and neither of those 2 teams won the conference.

It might lessen our resume slightly, but I’m not so sure we shouldn’t be rooting for A&M next week to upset LSU just in case Georgia lays a massive egg. In thay scenario, there is no debate. A 3-loss LSU isn’t getting in.
WTF? Have your feelz recalibrated. LSU is a two loss team that lost badly at home to a one loss UT that's only lost to the current #1.

There is really no debate. That 2-loss LSU will not bump UT.

If they blindly choose conf champs without considering strengths of schedules, strengths of wins, and strengths of losses, then they will need to start pulling in MAC champs and all the rest. Because, you know... Conf champs are conf champs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top