So I created a scoring system to help rank teams for playoff. Curious on thoughts:
- You get no points for unranked wins (unless the team later becomes ranked).
- You get a point for each point margin of victory over ranked teams.
- You get points based on the rank of the team you beat. Whereas, #25 earns you 1pt and upsetting #1 earns you 25pts. The same is true for what the team is currently ranked at the time of calculation. So if the team you beat is no-longer ranked you get no additional points. If you beat an unranked team that later becomes ranked, you get points.
- The scoring holds true for losses, but inverse. You get deductions for margin of loss by point, and what the team was ranked. So if you lost to #5, you lose 5 points. If they then climb to #2, you lose additional 2 points. If you lose to an unranked team its an automatic 50pt deduction (subject to change). For example: LSU lost to unranked Florida State by 1pt. That's -1 - 50 - 19 (FSU current rank) for deductions. Clear as mud?
If my math is correct here is how everyone would currently be ranked:
1. Vols - 146
2. UGA - 135
3. TCU - 123
4. OSU - 81
5. Bama - 57
6. UM - 55
7. LSU - 12* (big deduction from the unranked loss and margin of loss against us)
Of course then we could add, say, 50pts for a league championship. Whoever wins between UM and OsU should see a huge bump. Plus 50pts for winning their league probably. With the lead the Vols have taken we should at least finish out 4th despite being jumped after championship games, though I haven't done Pac12 teams yet.
Of course this scoring system has flaws and unintended consequences. We'd see teams leaving in starters trying to run up scores on most opponents (never know if an unranked opponent will sneak in the Top 25 late season). Also might see all 130+ teams be ranked so all scores are included. Would be some nonsense.
Just thought it was a good thought experiment.