UTProf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- Messages
- 12,776
- Likes
- 30,862
prosecutors want social media wielding housewives, or retired folk, defense wants degreed, or whomever can see gray. The court of public opinion has too much say. Reason for gag orders.
However question one in a police investigation SHOULD be were you at the scene? who is your alibi?
the burden should be to prove he was not there. if you can answer that question beyond the shadow.... what else is there? if he's not he's not, if he is he is.
Not enough to file charges is what is coming back on this. That doesn't mean all that much in terms of guilt or innocence, imo. Just that the prosecutors didn't think they had enough to win the case. He said/she said and I bet she was too intoxicated to be credible.
At any rate.... This is exactly why other nations don't publish the names of the accused or victims. Only names of the convicted are ever published. I think we should go to something similar. If someone's at large and considered a risk then obviously their name can be published but I've yet to see a good reason beyond apprehension to publish the name or names of the accused or their accusers.