Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 38,011
- Likes
- 75,973
That changes the game. Sounds like a(n attempted) protection of the individual's (supposed) rights at the state legislative/constitution level, verses the rights of an organization to define their own standards of membership.
I doubt the NCAA will challenge that law, but would there be a case for "we're not telling them that they can't make $$$ off their NIL, just that the university can't pay/facilitate the payments of NIL"...?
Whose rights are actually infringed with this law? Does an athlete actually have the right to play in the NCAA? Does a member institution have the right to pay/facilitate NIL as a recruiting enticement? Or does an organization have the right to set limits on who can join their org, both at the individual and school level?
I am all for NIL. At first glance, I am REALLY against this law.