volatil
Villains
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2009
- Messages
- 42,084
- Likes
- 100,404
NCAA proposing a rule that you have to wait at least ten seconds before you can snap the ball. Rule would not apply under 2 minutes. Would really hurt fast paced offenses, including ourselves. Just an idiotic rule imo. There is no reason for it. Probably just from whining from old school coaches who have no idea how to defend it
One argument I heard against this rule was that if not many teams snap the ball in that 10 second window then why make a rule to regulate it? The common answer is to give teams (i.e Alabama, Arkansas, etc.) who don't "like" playing against speed offenses time to make substitutions. It gives an unfair competitive advantage to the defense.
This rule is like saying since 5 cars on the interstate are going faster than everyone else then we should lower the speed limit 10 miles per hour for everyone's safety, it makes no sense.
While they are at it, lets put weight limits on DT's and LB's can only run so fast....:hi:
Sorry guys...I'm delirious, two sick little girls have kept me up all week. Thankfully, looks like both are getting better but mom and dad look like we could be cast in "The Walking Dead" and not need any makeup.
Ahhh, parenthood.
One argument I heard against this rule was that if not many teams snap the ball in that 10 second window then why make a rule to regulate it? The common answer is to give teams (i.e Alabama, Arkansas, etc.) who don't "like" playing against speed offenses time to make substitutions. It gives an unfair competitive advantage to the defense.
This rule is like saying since 5 cars on the interstate are going faster than everyone else then we should lower the speed limit 10 miles per hour for everyone's safety, it makes no sense.
While they are at it, lets put weight limits on DT's and LB's can only run so fast....:hi:
Rashaan Evans says backlash bad since committing to Alabama Crimson Tide over hometown Auburn Tigers - ESPN
Vol fans would never do this... would they? :question:
NCAA proposing a rule that you have to wait at least ten seconds before you can snap the ball. Rule would not apply under 2 minutes. Would really hurt fast paced offenses, including ourselves. Just an idiotic rule imo. There is no reason for it. Probably just from whining from old school coaches who have no idea how to defend it
One argument I heard against this rule was that if not many teams snap the ball in that 10 second window then why make a rule to regulate it? The common answer is to give teams (i.e Alabama, Arkansas, etc.) who don't "like" playing against speed offenses time to make substitutions. It gives an unfair competitive advantage to the defense.
This rule is like saying since 5 cars on the interstate are going faster than everyone else then we should lower the speed limit 10 miles per hour for everyone's safety, it makes no sense.
While they are at it, lets put weight limits on DT's and LB's can only run so fast....:hi:
Before offering a concrete opinion, Tennessee coach Butch Jones said he wants to further research a newly proposed NCAA football rule that would allow a defense to substitute in the first 10 seconds of a 40-second play clock even if the offense doesnt substitute.
"Id like to have research and data before altering and changing the rules of the game," Jones told WNML radio in an exclusive interview earlier today. "I want to see data produced from an injury standpoint. I dont want opinion. I want facts and figures. Show me the numbers."
Some coaches including Alabamas Nick Saban and Arkansas Bret Bielema -- have argued that the hurry up offense is a safety concern for players. The more snaps, the more chance for injury. Jones isnt so sure. He said hes been a part of teams running a hurry-up offense since 2001 and hes not seen an uptick in injuries in the last 20-25 plays of a game during that 12-year span.
"I dont think it comes down to a matter of safety," Jones said. "Its a matter of personal preference. Every program has a style of play, just like every basketball team, from pressing to pushing the ball down the court. Same thing in football. Thats what makes this game; the strategy that goes behind it."
Many argue that defensive players exert more energy than offensive players because defenders are taught to run to the football. Jones doesnt buy it.
"The way we play offense, we expect our guys to run to the football as well," Jones said. "We expect our offensive linemen to sprint to the football as well."
Jones said hes concerned that the substitution proposal is an attempt "to slow the game down a bit." But he added: "I dont know if it will affect the game that much."
Jones said he thinks a hurry-up offense can be an equalizer for teams that dont have as much talent as their opponents.
"A lot more things need to be addressed with player safety than up-tempo offense," Jones said. "Lets concern ourselves with real hard facts in moving the game forward."
Jones does favor a proposal in which if replay shows a targeting foul that led to an ejection is reversed, the penalty can also be nullified.
"I think it will be beneficial," Jones said. "Its really hard to tell your player, `you know what, you made a good play and it wasnt a penalty, but theyre still giving you a penalty."
It's very unlikely they are going to cancel it now. Sun is shining in Knoxville and weather is good through the weekend.
We will have a list of guys that are expected in this weekend in the War Room. It's not a big list, but there are some good players expected in this weekend.