Don't question the coaches they'll get you for it on this board. Lol They know more than you and I will ever know about anything at any time. Lol
Because we don't have true DEPENDABLE guys at WR. Putting Jennings in the game would signal obvious pass. He should've been moved/been playing safety from day 1 but coaches are dumb.
Byrd should be playing CB especially with how our coaches don't use him. Kid is a dominant DB and can jump out of the gym.
Evan Berry should be on offense but that's like Butch admitting he was wrong. Man would eat on offense with 10-12 various touches. With how he sheds tackles there's no way I wouldn't feed him too.
The coaches aren't always right, but I question anyone who thinks they have more information than the coaches and staff.
Player decisions go through position coaches, coordinators, and the head coach. Let's not forget all the administrative personnel, grad assistants, and QC guys giving input. I imagine group captains also give input.
I don't think watching games, high school highlights, and maybe a few snippets of practice is enough to warrant feeling like our opinions should be gospel.
Again, coaches get things wrong all the time, but to be so self-assured in our opinions with our tiny fragments of information seems naive to me. Voicing one's opinion is not only fine, it's expected on a message board. I just think it should also involve a little bit of humility and self-awareness.
Obviously, my opinion is not the norm.
The coaches aren't always right, but I question anyone who thinks they have more information than the coaches and staff.
Player decisions go through position coaches, coordinators, and the head coach. Let's not forget all the administrative personnel, grad assistants, and QC guys giving input. I imagine group captains also give input.
I don't think watching games, high school highlights, and maybe a few snippets of practice is enough to warrant feeling like our opinions should be gospel.
Again, coaches get things wrong all the time, but to be so self-assured in our opinions with our tiny fragments of information seems naive to me. Voicing one's opinion is not only fine, it's expected on a message board. I just think it should also involve a little bit of humility and self-awareness.
Obviously, my opinion is not the norm.
The coaches aren't always right, but I question anyone who thinks they have more information than the coaches and staff.
Player decisions go through position coaches, coordinators, and the head coach. Let's not forget all the administrative personnel, grad assistants, and QC guys giving input. I imagine group captains also give input.
I don't think watching games, high school highlights, and maybe a few snippets of practice is enough to warrant feeling like our opinions should be gospel.
Again, coaches get things wrong all the time, but to be so self-assured in our opinions with our tiny fragments of information seems naive to me. Voicing one's opinion is not only fine, it's expected on a message board. I just think it should also involve a little bit of humility and self-awareness.
Obviously, my opinion is not the norm.
I think there are serious questions about this staff and their use of players. It is mind numbing that Kamara wasn't starting over Hurd now. Why is Warrior not playing more at safety when he is clearly faster and a better tackler than both guys playing back there. Sure, he may make some mistakes, but his athleticism and talent would make up for them. Berry on offense is a no brained. I have no idea what they're thinking there. Not to mention, how long did it take before they put him in over the other returner, I can't even remember his name. He was terrible and they refused to play Berry over him until he got injured. This goes back to last year. Why in the world was Jumper playing over DKjr until week 6 or something. Worley over Dobbs in 2014? Personally, I also hate seeing Phillips moved inside when he was so fast coming off the edge at end. When Barnett leaves we have no proven pass rushers if they insist on playing him inside. There are some real questions here in the coaches handling of personnel.
Hypothetical scenario:
- We win out
- Florida beats LSU
- LSU beats aTm
- Bama beats Auburn
- FSU beats Florida
- Bama destroys Florida
That means we finish 9-3 and are the only SEC team besides Bama with less than 4 losses. Good enough for Capital One bowl and possibly Sugar Bowl.
Is that a better scenario for us than LSU beating Florida and then we lose big to Bama and finish 9-4?