Recruiting Forum Football Talk XXXIII

Status
Not open for further replies.
#11,926
#11,926
85SugarVol said:
That's really what I was wondering about. What is the specific SEC rule regarding grad transfers?
Click to expand...

I don't know all the specifics, but there is a current rule that says something along the lines of "if you bring in a grad transfer whose academics don't meet some requirement or another, then you can't take another grad transfer for 3 years."

In 2014 UF brought in two grad transfers who didn't meet their academic requirements to stay eligible after enrollment. So UF is currently under a 3 year ban from accepting grad transfers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#11,927
#11,927
Rishvol said:
Yes I do remember but starting when the player was drafted usually states where you think he was good. My statement still stands that he couldn't win at ND so why should his back up win at UF
Click to expand...

Completely illogical.

You're equating Notre Dame's season as a team to the skill set of their starting QB, and furthermore making assumptions about their backup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#11,928
#11,928
Darth_Shiveman said:
FWIW, Zaire can't enroll until/unless the SEC votes changes a rule about grad transfers in the next week or two at meetings.

Seems likely to happen, but the rule needs a majority to pass and it would be hilarious if the other schools in the east band together to put it off a year and screw over UF.
Click to expand...


The article I read yesterday said that they could give him a waiver.
 
#11,929
#11,929
Darth_Shiveman said:
I don't know all the specifics, but there is a current rule that says something along the lines of "if you bring in a grad transfer whose academics don't meet some requirement or another, then you can't take another grad transfer for 3 years."

In 2014 UF brought in two grad transfers who didn't meet their academic requirements to stay eligible after enrollment. So UF is currently under a 3 year ban from accepting grad transfers.
Click to expand...

Then they don't deserve a change in rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#11,930
#11,930
85SugarVol said:
Completely illogical.

You're equating Notre Dame's season as a team to the skill set of their starting QB, and furthermore making assumptions about their backup.
Click to expand...

Yes because he struggled. So as a backup you need to push the starter. Which did not happen. So if the backup cannot challenge the starter of a struggling team how is he supposed to lead a questionable team?
 
#11,932
#11,932
Rishvol said:
Yes because he struggled. So as a backup you need to push the starter. Which did not happen. So if the backup cannot challenge the starter of a struggling team how is he supposed to lead a questionable team?
Click to expand...

He just got drafted #52 overall in the NFL draft. You're going to argue that he was what was wrong?
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top