DefenseWins
Beating Florida this year
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2019
- Messages
- 803
- Likes
- 970
Imagine actually asking a question this stupid
poor people work their ass off. CEOs and upper level managers subsist off their labor. The least they can do is pay higher taxes so those with nothing can get proper treatment when theyāre ill without having to worry about going bankrupt
There seems to be a campaign of vilifying the poor that's been persistent for ... as long as I can remember.
There are 'welfare queens' out there, but we shouldn't look at 5% of people gaming the system and punish the other 95% that truly depend on the social safety net. Wanting a fairer, more even playing field =/= wanting free hand-outs. Wanting a social safety net that can take care of the elderly, disabled, and vulnerable is more patriotic than a Libertarian dismantling of the safety net.
Youāre right. That mindset drives me insane though
So, because someone is wealthy, and at least half of the time earned their claim to riches, they deserved to keep others afloat?Not a political person but agree with so much of what you just said.
Me hiring many contractors over the years and being around their laborers so often, the "lazy" and "entitled" narratives, drive me crazy.
Way more hard working people that just don't have opportunities for livable wages than "welfare queens". Despite how many people paint it as the opposite.
Why I avoid the political forums.
VN posters that spend at least half of their work day posting on a FB site, grouping people with 2 jobs and scared to take a sick day, in the "lazy" category.
Ridiculous.
Yes, some people work their whole lives trying to reach the top and come short. Those people we should help.
Most, either get a job and dont try to continue to improve their situation or only try enough to remain on welfare.
Others shouldnt have to pay for your happiness.
2 things I'm convinced of.So, because someone is wealthy, and at least half of the time earned their claim to riches, they deserved to keep others afloat?
I came from a poor family. Parents divorced, both remarried. One continued to have money issues, the other worked their way up and succeeded from their previous situation. Only now is that person truly nearly set to retire. The other never got to the point of being able to retire wealthy because of life choices.
Yes, some people work their whole lives trying to reach the top and come short. Those people we should help. Most, either get a job and dont try to continue to improve their situation or only try enough to remain on welfare.
I know the world fairly well, as I have lived both sides of it. YOU make your situation what it is. Others shouldnt have to pay for your happiness.
I think there is a fundamental flaw in your thinking. You are calling happiness being able to care for yourself or your kids and not go broke.So, because someone is wealthy, and at least half of the time earned their claim to riches, they deserved to keep others afloat?
I came from a poor family. Parents divorced, both remarried. One continued to have money issues, the other worked their way up and succeeded from their previous situation. Only now is that person truly nearly set to retire. The other never got to the point of being able to retire wealthy because of life choices.
Yes, some people work their whole lives trying to reach the top and come short. Those people we should help. Most, either get a job and dont try to continue to improve their situation or only try enough to remain on welfare.
I know the world fairly well, as I have lived both sides of it. YOU make your situation what it is. Others shouldnt have to pay for your happiness.
I donāt think itās an America ācaringā issue. I think specifically within the 2 major parties, they each hold fundamentally different views as to what constitutes āhelp/welfare.ā I think both sides (or the majority of people on each side st least maybe not the ones who have the megaphones) want to help those they perceive to be poor and innocent. However, with so much information in the palm of everyoneās hand, it gets tougher and tougher to reliably discern who the truly innocent poor even is. I definitely donāt believe the guy sitting in his badass office in D.C. has any better idea than the rest of us. Crazy complicated world we live in.I think there is a fundamental flaw in your thinking. You are calling happiness being able to care for yourself or your kids and not go broke.
I guess I live in a fairytale land where I think fundamentally (even aside from your religious beliefs) that if you have extra you should help someone and if you donāt have what you need then you should be helped.
The ironic thought to me is, is that the same people (not saying you at all) that believe āthese people only want me to pay for them so they donāt have to workā often are the same people that are incredibly prideful in there achievement and feel superior because of their tax bracket and might on a good day check their box because they gave to ______ all the while the people they are looking down on work harder for less than they do.
If America really cared about something like... people. Then no one in America would go to bed hungry.
I understand people cheat the system but donāt be so ignorant to think itās only one way. The same people that cheat it not wanting to work, there is an equal (maybe more) amount of people cheating it for their financial gain because their security is in their bottom line and you donāt have to be a millionaire for that to be true.
Itās amazing to me a historical building that burned on ND campus got hundreds of millions to rebuild it so quickly.... but yet you donāt see that money coughed up for people in need... I understand itās different but I donāt believe the heart issue is. It does send a loud message to people that buildings are more valuable than people.I donāt think itās an America ācaringā issue. I think specifically within the 2 major parties, they each hold fundamentally different views as to what constitutes āhelp/welfare.ā I think both sides (or the majority of people on each side st least maybe not the ones who have the megaphones) want to help those they perceive to be poor and innocent. However, with so much information in the palm of everyoneās hand, it gets tougher and tougher to reliably discern who the truly innocent poor even is. I definitely donāt believe the guy sitting in his badass office in D.C. has any better idea than the rest of us. Crazy complicated world we live in.
I donāt think itās an America ācaringā issue. I think specifically within the 2 major parties, they each hold fundamentally different views as to what constitutes āhelp/welfare.ā I think both sides (or the majority of people on each side st least maybe not the ones who have the megaphones) want to help those they perceive to be poor and innocent. However, with so much information in the palm of everyoneās hand, it gets tougher and tougher to reliably discern who the truly innocent poor even is. I definitely donāt believe the guy sitting in his badass office in D.C. has any better idea than the rest of us. Crazy complicated world we live in.
This is only exactly what I'm saying. It also means tackling the root causes of WHY people come up short-- unaffordable medical expenses, sky-high childcare costs, and higher education that's becoming more and more expensive by the semester with lower and lower ROI.
2 things I'm convinced of.
1. I said nothing of making anyone pay, so quoting me made no sense.
2. If "most" of the people you know just wanted to get by and never improve, that tells me more about what kind of people that you were around than it tells me about most of the working class.
I think there is a fundamental flaw in your thinking. You are calling happiness being able to care for yourself or your kids and not go broke.
I guess I live in a fairytale land where I think fundamentally (even aside from your religious beliefs) that if you have extra you should help someone and if you donāt have what you need then you should be helped.
The ironic thought to me is, is that the same people (not saying you at all) that believe āthese people only want me to pay for them so they donāt have to workā often are the same people that are incredibly prideful in there achievement and feel superior because of their tax bracket and might on a good day check their box because they gave to ______ all the while the people they are looking down on work harder for less than they do.
If America really cared about something like... people. Then no one in America would go to bed hungry.
I understand people cheat the system but donāt be so ignorant to think itās only one way. The same people that cheat it not wanting to work, there is an equal (maybe more) amount of people cheating it for their financial gain because their security is in their bottom line and you donāt have to be a millionaire for that to be true.
Alright, that's more than enough.My mistake if you feel I quoted you out of turn. You were only mentioned because of your input in this discussion, however, for you to question my character based on my stance on the subject or to take aim at some of my family by saying "that tells me more about what kind of people that you were around than it tells me about most of the working class," that tells me more of your character. I already stated I grew up poor. I know many people that are poor, several coming from close family. Not all poor people choice to be poor, but half if not most, choose to stay in there situation because that is what they know and some are afraid of change. You dont have to agree with me but there is no need to belittle me because our beliefs dont align.
I watched the Israel fight. It was really good. All the guys I watched tho, Hughes, Liddell, Silva, Franklin, Fedor, Cro Cop, theyāre all old now. No characters that really excite me anymore. Bones was gonna be the guy but heās bone headed.
Thatās crazy to me. Thatās exactly what I am saying whenever I mention āchecking off your box because you helped someoneā I understand that people learn by going through the process so I donāt disagree there. However, it seems as though you patronize them by saying, ā you can do it you will get there itās okayā while you go off and go out to eat with your family and a steak dinner while they have nothing to eat. Itās good to teach them but in the learning process it would be extremely cold hearted to just give them advice and not offer a hand up. You wouldnāt do that to your children why would you do that to a hurting family who have children?I agree with your sentiment here, only i would add that raising minimum wage to "increase" ones income only makes it harder on the middle class, leaving the lower class in the same state because of inflation.
Also, I truly believe most people come up short because there is a lack of accountability in ones self along with the lack of training and teaching in school and home to help them further understand how to manage money.
My mistake if you feel I quoted you out of turn. You were only mentioned because of your input in this discussion, however, for you to question my character based on my stance on the subject or to take aim at some of my family by saying "that tells me more about what kind of people that you were around than it tells me about most of the working class," that tells me more of your character. I already stated I grew up poor. I know many people that are poor, several coming from close family. Not all poor people choice to be poor, but half if not most, choose to stay in there situation because that is what they know and some are afraid of change. You dont have to agree with me but there is no need to belittle me because our beliefs dont align.
One of my parents has been poor most of their life and is still. However, for the most part I believe they are happy.
I believe everyone should lend a helping hand, truly. However, I do not believe one should be helped without honest stuggle. I am prideful that I provide for my family, but I dont shun people that cant. I try to help them help themselves through encouragement and faith not by money.
I envy the days when most were to prideful to hold out there hands. Sorry.