SLICKYINC
Beef n cheddar
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 22,532
- Likes
- 82,428
What he said is not wrong...the little evidences that point to unwarranted regression at UGA are more subtle than just a few numbers. You see it when you watch their games. Coaching is their achilles heel, not talent. Kirby Dumb just about lost that game against AU.UGA is returning to the SECC for the third straight year, but the programs are heading in opposite directions? UT has more room for growth since they have nowhere to go but up. Kirby is an elite recruiter in a talent rich state, so I doubt the recruiting bottoms out. LSU and their high powered offense managed 2 more points against Auburn than UGA did and won by a lesser margin. The lack of experience and returning production at receiver certainly hurt UGA, but saying that wins over 3 ranked teams is a sign of regression is a bit ridiculous. UGA has more top 10 wins than any other top 10 team besides LSU and is tied with LSU for ranked wins overall.
Such a travesty that VN was robbed of podcasting gloryAlready swamped with dem podcasters running around loose in the city.
No Frank! was just a joke...
Wait, just wait!
View attachment 239449
Check the recruiting rankings of bama, Clemson, OSU, and any other team to have won it. In fact, when is the last time a team who recruited outside the top 10 won a championship? You think it’s just a coincidence that teams that recruit well do well?UTC. You? And recruiting rankings are only one of many elements of a successful program. Only one team a year wins a championship. And the last several years it has been Bama or Clemson. So by your logic are those the only 2 teams that have successful football programs? Face it. Your thinking is dumb.