i know y'all keep trying to carve out these plausibility footholds, but if you read the article, its vendors that have completed jobs, approved by the general contractor, and then told-- en masse- their work was inferior and payment wasn't coming (and then in some cases these "inferior" vendors are being asked to work for the trump org again!).
so the trump org is either just stiffing vendors, or is atrociously bad at vetting beforehand and keeps hiring "inferior" subcontractors. so, malicious or inept. i suppose it could be a mix of both. and the point you guys all seem to be missing is that it doesn't matter who else is sued how often; he's the president and he's still stiffing vendors, for example the handful of cities he holds rallies in and refuses to reimburse for security.