Recruiting Forum Off Topic Thread III

Status
Not open for further replies.
They are in their cars in a parking lot at a drive in service at church. It is unconstitutional what they are doing. Are they arresting the people in their cars at the grocery store? AG Barr disagrees that this is the law, btw.
I do agree its over the top. there's more important things to attend too.
 
I design machine and process control equipment and get to see first hand how technology is great for humanity. I love technology, and I'm all in on technology that improves and extends our lives...until it is clear that technology is the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. Then the Spidey Sense starts tingling.
 
That is a lot of trust, especially with the UN and Microsoft. Your existence without it would be wiped away.
EVFXLZDUMAAZbMu
One thing this virus has proved to me beyond a shadow of a doubt...

People will absolutely flush their liberties down the toilet in exchange for temporary "safety"...and they will turn on their neighbors for the same reason.
 
Sorry, not sure I follow your 2 questions.

Sorry.

Why is the UN and Microsoft doing this? They are not exactly benevolent.
Second and more importantly, you seem to indicate that this is being done for digital security. My question is, why can't each entity that currently has our data implement these same security measures individually? Why would it have to fall under a single entity to implement?
 
They are in their cars in a parking lot at a drive in service at church. It is unconstitutional what they are doing. Are they arresting the people in their cars at the grocery store? AG Barr disagrees that this is the law, btw.
It was for the people going to an in-person service. That is why.

Several Easter churchgoers vow to ignore quarantine notices troopers leave on windshields

"Most calls were for outdoor services, where people remained in their cars. Those services “were specifically mentioned by the governor as being allowed,” Lawson said.

At Maryville, the people who stayed in their cars and listened to the service through the outdoor speaker did not receive quarantine notices."
 
It was for the people going to an in-person service. That is why.

Several Easter churchgoers vow to ignore quarantine notices troopers leave on windshields

"Most calls were for outdoor services, where people remained in their cars. Those services “were specifically mentioned by the governor as being allowed,” Lawson said.

At Maryville, the people who stayed in their cars and listened to the service through the outdoor speaker did not receive quarantine notices."
Yes, I realized that later. I thought it was for a drive in service. But still, there are governors trying to ban drive in services as well so the point still stands. And it is still a frightening precedent to arrest and fine Christian people for assembling and worshipping.
 
Sorry.

Why is the UN and Microsoft doing this? They are not exactly benevolent.
Second and more importantly, you seem to indicate that this is being done for digital security. My question is, why can't each entity that currently has our data implement these same security measures individually? Why would it have to fall under a single entity to implement?
? I missed any part where the UN or Microsoft has any part doing "this". Someone posted a link to ID2020, which is a U.S. nonprofit organization, and that is what I've been reading. Not sure what Microsoft or UN has to do with this nonprofit standard setter.

As to your second question, this is what we currently have. We give out info to everyone and everything and they control our information. Identity theft is growing at an insane rate and much because no companies can safeguard OUR info. Why would we not more privacy and control? We currently have little.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geaux_Vols
? I missed any part where the UN or Microsoft has any part doing "this". Someone posted a link to ID2020, which is a U.S. nonprofit organization, and that is what I've been reading. Not sure what Microsoft or UN has to do with this nonprofit standard setter.

As to your second question, this is what we currently have. We give out info to everyone and everything and they control our information. Identity theft is growing at an insane rate and much because no companies can safeguard OUR info. Why would we not more privacy and control? We currently have little.
Microsoft is a founding member of the alliance for ID2020 ID2020 | Alliance & Governance
 
Yes, I realized that later. I thought it was for a drive in service. But still, there are governors trying to ban drive in services as well so the point still stands. And it is still a frightening precedent to arrest and fine Christian people for assembling and worshipping.
Are they arresting and fining? They placed a notice on their windshields 😂

More histrionics. Outrage society at its finest.
 
Are they arresting and fining? They placed a notice on their windshields 😂

More histrionics. Outrage society at its finest.
It isn't outrage. It is a dangerous precedent being set. And yes, Pastors have been arrested. Yes, church members in Mississippi have either been threatened with fines or fined. And this includes drive up services, not just standard services. Drive thru church doesn't harm anyone.
 
Microsoft is a founding member of the alliance for ID2020 ID2020 | Alliance & Governance
I see they have members on the technical boards. I have no doubt they have interest in setting the underlying blockchain tech. They and many others have poured billions into the technology. They find ways onto tons of nonprofit boards.

It is like asking why Carnegie would want to have a stake on railroad boards.
 
It isn't outrage. It is a dangerous precedent being set. And yes, Pastors have been arrested. Yes, church members in Mississippi have either been threatened with fines or fined. And this includes drive up services, not just standard services. Drive thru church doesn't harm anyone.
I totally agree with drive thrus. That is absurd if really happening. It just comes down to public safety, not religion.
 
I see they have members on the technical boards. I have no doubt they have interest in setting the underlying blockchain tech. They and many others have poured billions into the technology. They find ways onto tons of nonprofit boards.

It is like asking why Carnegie would want to have a stake on railroad boards.

Why cant the blockchain technology be implemented with our existing accounts?
 
I see they have members on the technical boards. I have no doubt they have interest in setting the underlying blockchain tech. They and many others have poured billions into the technology. They find ways onto tons of nonprofit boards.

It is like asking why Carnegie would want to have a stake on railroad boards.
I mean, you asked what Microsoft had to do with them and I told you
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devo182
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top