tvolsfan
VN GURU
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 39,758
- Likes
- 12,857
King was a great player, no doubt...but this is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. Michael Jordan, Bill Russell, Bird, Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Tim Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Shaq, Olajuwon - maybe that's not the top 10, but those 10 people exist, and King would have to be better than at least one of them. No chance.
King was a great player, no doubt...but this is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. Michael Jordan, Bill Russell, Bird, Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Tim Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Shaq, Olajuwon - maybe that's not the top 10, but those 10 people exist, and King would have to be better than at least one of them. No chance.
King was a great player, no doubt...but this is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. Michael Jordan, Bill Russell, Bird, Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Tim Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Shaq, Olajuwon - maybe that's not the top 10, but those 10 people exist, and King would have to be better than at least one of them. No chance.
How old are you? Did you see Bernard King in his prime? Give him a full career and put him in a good organization -- not the Knicks or the Bullets -- and he could have been at least as good as three or four of the guys on your list.
I didn't, but I know a lot of people who did. None of them have ever mentioned Bernard King in anything close to a top whatever, even hypothetically.
King was probably in top two or three of best SEC players EVER--he was that good. In a class by himself. He's in the top 20 NBA all-time, but don't think he ever won a title, did he? I don't recall him being on many very good teams. You never quite get your due if you don't win titles, no matter how good you are. Explosive quickness and a deft shooting touching.
Bernard King was a 6'7 wing, and for five seasons, shot 56% from the field.
To put that in perspective, everyone is going gaga over LeBron shooting 55% this year...King did that for FIVE YEARS
I didn't, but I know a lot of people who did. None of them have ever mentioned Bernard King in anything close to a top whatever, even hypothetically.
To put that in a better perspective, so did quite a few other small forwards in the 1980s. It was a different game back then, with quite a bit more scoring that what we see today. Adrian Dantley had the same averages, except Dantley did it at a higher volume. No one's comparing him to LeBron.
Not to mention the fact that there's more to basketball than scoring in the first place. What about King's defense? His rebounding?
I don't want to seem like I'm going out of my way to bash the guy, because he really does belong in the HOF, but when people are overrating his NBA career to obscene levels it's hard not to come across that way. He was not a top 10 player of all time, nor was he good enough to be one. Let's stop it before some UK fan stumbles upon this and mocks our homerism gone wild.
King was a great player, no doubt...but this is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. Michael Jordan, Bill Russell, Bird, Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Tim Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Shaq, Olajuwon - maybe that's not the top 10, but those 10 people exist, and King would have to be better than at least one of them. No chance.
How old are you? Did you see Bernard King in his prime? Give him a full career and put him in a good organization -- not the Knicks or the Bullets -- and he could have been at least as good as three or four of the guys on your list.