Retired 3-Star General Michael Flynn

#51
#51
Ok. Think of it logically. What would be more likely the cause of you strapping a bomb to yourself?

Religious differences?

Your brother being killed in an explosion?

Wouldn't you have to be a muslim living in a craphole 3rd world country like Iraq or Iran to have the proper frame of reference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#52
#52
what he^ said

I'll add that almost every other Western leader has labeled these acts as radical Islam yet they are not suggesting it is a war between Islam and other religions.

It is ludicrous to suggest using that label to accurately describe these acts 1) would be worse than the killing of innocents we've perpetrated and 2) would "ramp things up".

His partisan logic is stupid.
 
#53
#53
Your logic skills are atrocious.

Obviously, we are going to drone them wherever we are confident we can get to them, bearing in mind the risks. But to have the leader of the West take the stage and frame the debate as Christianity versus Islam, yes, that is what ISIS wants and he's not going to give it to them.

Tell you what, other than like Trump, any of the rational GOP candidates, if they actually were to win the general and take office, would rapidly dial back their rhetoric to the contrary.


Why do you keep interjecting Christianity? They are screaming "Death to America!" You are the one projecting this as a Christian vs. Islam war.

This is a war between our freedoms, enjoyed by peaceful Muslims, Jews, Christians, et al, versus radical Islamic Extremists.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#55
#55
CNN’s Lawyers Are Making An Insane Argument In Court

shutterstock_2062781060-scaled-e1660591694265.jpg


Lawyers for CNN are trying to argue that retweets and follows qualify as endorsements as they fight a suit brought by relatives of former Trump adviser Michael Flynn who allege CNN defamed them by suggesting they were QAnon followers.

CNN ran a story showing John and Leslie Flynn at a meeting with the chyron reading “CNN Goes Inside a Gathering of QAnon Followers.” The couple alleged defamation because they said they are not QAnon followers and do not adhere to the group’s “dangerous, extremist, racist, anti-Semitic and violent beliefs,” according to Bloomberg Law.

But CNN is arguing that retweeting and following QAnon’s Twitter page is grounds for endorsement.

United States District Judge Gregory H. Woods denied CNN’s motion for reconsideration and a motion to certify an interlocutory appeal Friday in a Memorandum Opinion and Order.

CNN’s Lawyers Are Making An Insane Argument In Court
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider

VN Store



Back
Top