Rickyvol77
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Messages
- 16,786
- Likes
- 21,566
#1. I never said winning the conf tourney was insignificant.
#2. I never said Barnes hasn't earned his salary.
#3. I never said he is "not good enough".
For you to say that I'm cherry picking my argument, you seem to have build a straw man and are saying things that I've never said.
I'm not changing what I said, I'm explaining to you what I meant. If I didn't phrase it the best way, I apologize.
I literally did in the post you quoted. You can gauge how a teams season went MORE by where they finish in the regular season standings vs how they do in the conf tourney.
How did the season go? It went really well. It got better since I posted the thread. They didn't win the conf, however, but tied for 2nd.
Why would you gauge how well a team did for a season based off a tournament that.lasted only a couple of games vs the entire season?
I was 15 when they hired Pearl. That's when I started watching them. I'm 31 now so half my life I've watched regularly.“Also, I'm not huge into basketball, mostly just March madness until Tenn became watchable so perhaps”
Yea ok
#1. I never said winning the conf tourney was insignificant.
#2. I never said Barnes hasn't earned his salary.
#3. I never said he is "not good enough".
For you to say that I'm cherry picking my argument, you seem to have build a straw man and are saying things that I've never said.
I'm not changing what I said, I'm explaining to you what I meant. If I didn't phrase it the best way, I apologize.
I literally did in the post you quoted. You can gauge how a teams season went MORE by where they finish in the regular season standings vs how they do in the conf tourney.
How did the season go? It went really well. It got better since I posted the thread. They didn't win the conf, however, but tied for 2nd.
Why would you gauge how well a team did for a season based off a tournament that.lasted only a couple of games vs the entire season?
Again, you're putting words in my mouth. I never said it was insignificant. They haven't won it in 43 years. That's a huge deal. I'm saying it's not as big of a deal in general to tell how a teams season went as it is with the regular season standing (barring major injuries or something).Semantics. You are trying to tell me that you brushed off the conference tournament as nothing, yet want to say it’s not insignificant.
The mindset of some of our fans is mind boggling. While you didn’t specifically say that Barnes didn’t earn his salary, that’s part of the equation on here. You truly haven’t been around if you don’t know that.
Just enjoy the ride of a coach who has totally changed the trajectory of our program when he got here and is actually putting hardware in our trophy case.
Again, you're putting words in my mouth. I never said it was insignificant. They haven't won it in 43 years. That's a huge deal. I'm saying it's not as big of a deal in general to tell how a teams season went as it is with the regular season standing (barring major injuries or something).
Im glad you admit I didn't say anything about him not early his salary. I don't care what others say. This thread is specifically about what I have said.
I've never made a thread on the basketball forum that I recall. The ONE time I do I even start off showing how much I like Barnes and hope he stays so people don't think I'm a "hater" and yet many on here say that I may be.
I've enjoyed much of the season as I have his tenure here. I was just getting frustrated from the same old issues that creep up under a Barnes team.
And I clearly never thought Barnes wasn't "good enough" because I have said in this thread that it's my own fault that I keep getting my hopes up. So you could say I thought he was better than he is.
I agree and I forgot about the merge, my bad.This topic and thread have been merged several times because of the number of times it has been brought up- over and over again. You aren’t paying attention anymore if you don’t know about the salary argument.
Again, that’s a lot to spout off to say that you are disappointed. The lesson for everyone is that basketball is not like football. It’s a long season, and teams lose. But, they can improve. Barnes has never had a team that is this elite defensively. Enjoy.
Wow you people get your panties in a wad over a simple phrase don't you?
I've seen on Facebook message boards pics that Tenn is "SEC championships" with no context that it's the tourney instead of the reg season.
Winning the reg season is more "TELLING" of how a teams season went than a tournament that lasted a couple of games.
The official conference champion is the winner of the SEC tournament. Been that way since 1979.
Honest question: Do you think Auburn had a better entire SEC season than the Vols considering details below?
Auburn finished reg. season 15-3, and reg. season champs. Including SEC tourney, their final record in SEC play was 15-4. In reg. season, all teams play each other at least once, and each team played 5 teams twice (home & away). Auburn’s 5 home & away SEC opponents were a combined 31-49 in SEC reg. season.
Our Vols were 14-4 reg. season, and a 17-4 final record in SEC play including SEC tourney, SEC tourney champs, and official SEC champs. The Vols’ 5 home & away SEC opponents were a combined 49-31 in SEC reg. season.
To me , these details show a cinch of a case for the Vols slightly ahead of Auburn for entire SEC play. How ‘bout you?
Idk the context of his comments but despite the crazy stay that UT hasn't won the tourney in 43 years... sorry I don't get the hype of getting hot for a few games and winning a tourney at the end of the year. Bad or avg teams win it all the time. Tenn didn't win the reg season which is way more telling to me. I promise I'm not trying to minimize the tourney win. It wasn't random-UT is playing some great ball right now.
Is Rick Barnes more than a sweet 16 coach?
Wow you people get your panties in a wad over a simple phrase don't you?
I've seen on Facebook message boards pics that Tenn is "SEC championships" with no context that it's the tourney instead of the reg season.
Winning the reg season is more "TELLING" of how a teams season went than a tournament that lasted a couple of games.
Again, you're putting words in my mouth. I never said it was insignificant. They haven't won it in 43 years. That's a huge deal. I'm saying it's not as big of a deal in general to tell how a teams season went as it is with the regular season standing (barring major injuries or something).
Im glad you admit I didn't say anything about him not early his salary. I don't care what others say. This thread is specifically about what I have said.
I've never made a thread on the basketball forum that I recall. The ONE time I do I even start off showing how much I like Barnes and hope he stays so people don't think I'm a "hater" and yet many on here say that I may be.
I've enjoyed much of the season as I have his tenure here. I was just getting frustrated from the same old issues that creep up under a Barnes team.
And I clearly never thought Barnes wasn't "good enough" because I have said in this thread that it's my own fault that I keep getting my hopes up. So you could say I thought he was better than he is.
Meh. Official titles aside, the automatic bid is where the weight is.Not true.
The SECT winner was the official champion from 1935-1950 but since 1979 the SEC Champion is the team(s) with the best regular season conference record with split championships recognized. SECT winner is Tournament Champion and receives an automatic bid to the NCAAT.
Why would you gauge how well a team did for a season based off a tournament that.lasted only a couple of games vs the entire season?
Sorry, I wasn’t directing my post at you. I didn’t quote anyone. I was adding it as a joke to the theme of this thread. It just happened after your last post at the time. Apologies for the confusion.Me: I love Barnes and want him to coach for as long as he wants but he's a sweet 16 coach at best.
Some: yOu'Re A bArNeS hAtEr!