OrangeTsar
Alabama delenda est
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 19,691
- Likes
- 48,398
In an interview with MIT Technology Review in November 2020, when asked about freedom of speech, Agrawal said: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment, but our role is to serve a healthy public conversation ... [and to] focus less on thinking about free speech, but thinking about how the times have changed."
Because those who want to cancel people are afraid they will make some reply to a controversial post only for that person to edit said post into something else making THEM look stupidWhat is the argument against an “Edit” button on Twitter? Anyone know?
@evillawyer @Velo Vol @n_huffhines
When you “quote” a msg here, the original post is saved. It matters not if the op goes back and edits it once it’s been quoted.Because those who want to cancel people are afraid they will make some reply to a controversial post only for that person to edit said post into something else making THEM look stupid
What is the argument against an “Edit” button on Twitter? Anyone know?
@evillawyer @Velo Vol @n_huffhines
I get that.
But even with an Edit button - people would be quoting and screenshot like crazy.
Because someone can post something and it gets reposted a bunch of times and then the first person entirely changes what got retweeted.What is the argument against an “Edit” button on Twitter? Anyone know?
@evillawyer @Velo Vol @n_huffhines
I don’t know. Was just curious about the Edit button.But if I just look at an old tweet and the replies below it, I will not know OP or replies were edited. It could give the option to click and read the old tweet/replies, but if that's the case, what are we arguing about here? Why does this matter to a conversation about free speech?