RIP Twitter

Nobody knew Mayor Pete was terrible at his job until Elon and Vlad decided to orchestrate this smear campaign.

People need to hear the vies of his Mayoral constituents, Probably scrubbed by now.
Dude likes to portray himself as an intellectual. A fake in science and substance. And I am being objective
 
Look, during "the election", the time period we will call this. There were absolutely fbi and cia all over twitter. I know. I was talking to some of them. They THOUGHT they were being anon and talking to an idiot, but I knew I was talking to them. They were giving me personality tests and ****. Basically interviewing and profiling me. GOOD! I didn't care. I wasn't doing anything wrong, and I was talking to presidential candidates! Basically texting with very powerful people. I didn't care if they were checking me out, I expected it. I just let them do their job.
It was all fun and games until one day... I was able to type a whole book on twitter. I was the only one the WORLD that could tweet as much as I wanted, as long as I wanted. Someone WANTED me to keep talking. They WANTED me to keep tweeting. I knew right then I had been targeted by the russians. i hit the delete and never looked back.
It's obvious they weren't doing their jobs, if they had been you'd be locked in a padded cell right now.
 
The guy who own's Twitter is evil for promoting his own tweet. The previous owners of Twitter were not evil for deleting true stories on behalf of the FBI.
It's legit hilarious how fragile these grown men are, just because their side can't ban the other side anymore 🤣. I don't think I've ever called anyone a snowflake, but there's at least 4-5 in this thread. They are so fragile to hear a different opinion, that they're making themselves look desperate,🤣.
 
If you’re responding to my post, I didn’t say he was evil?

But he should be made fun of for his fragile ego.

Can't make fun of him in here unless you despise him. This is not a place for laughs. Only hate or hero worship. And if you make fun of him, it means you are pro-FBI...even if you've been saying abolish the FBI since the Ron Paul days.
 
Can't make fun of him in here unless you despise him. This is not a place for laughs. Only hate or hero worship. And if you make fun of him, it means you are pro-FBI...even if you've been saying abolish the FBI since the Ron Paul days.

Lol sometimes from the responses I have to wonder if posters are reading something different than what I am? Like are some of them inserting words that aren’t there or imagining things or what
 
Twit is involved in a murdoch, truther smear campaign against Mayor Pete today. First the train derailment started trended. When I saw all the misinformation and panic buttons being hit... it REEKED of truther. I knew it as soon as I saw it. I thought they were going to tie it to Biden, and was waiting for it. Turned out Mayor Pete was giving a speech today, and they tied it to him. 100% murdoch and the truther crowd working with the paypal mafia and kushners. It's a smear campaign.
Funny thing is they don’t need a train wreck for Pete to suck at his job. He was in over his head the minute he took the job.
 
Can't make fun of him in here unless you despise him. This is not a place for laughs. Only hate or hero worship. And if you make fun of him, it means you are pro-FBI...even if you've been saying abolish the FBI since the Ron Paul days.

For years you sat there and said "Twitter is a private company. They can censor whoever they want. Get over it." Then when we find out that they were colluding with the FBI all you had to say was "Whoa". And then a laundry list of posts saying "Well ackchyually..." regarding the FBI involvement and how it wasn't technically censorship on behalf of the FBI. For being so staunchly against the FBI, you certainly gave them a lot of benefit of the doubt when it came to the Twitter files. Weird.
 
Can't make fun of him in here unless you despise him. This is not a place for laughs. Only hate or hero worship. And if you make fun of him, it means you are pro-FBI...even if you've been saying abolish the FBI since the Ron Paul days.

Your "Dunk on Elon" to "Criticize FBI Involement in Twitter" ratio is about 10:1
 
For years you sat there and said "Twitter is a private company. They can censor whoever they want. Get over it." Then when we find out that they were colluding with the FBI all you had to say was "Whoa". And then a laundry list of posts saying "Well ackchyually..." regarding the FBI involvement and how it wasn't technically censorship on behalf of the FBI. For being so staunchly against the FBI, you certainly gave them a lot of benefit of the doubt when it came to the Twitter files. Weird.

Just because I hate the FBI and think private companies can censor on their platforms doesn't mean I'm not going to try to get to the truth of the matter. I know this can be confusing for some people who just want to flame everything they don't like for whatever reason.

Link to the bolded, please. I don't know what you're referencing, but I would guess this is the 1000th time your bias didn't allow you to see the nuance of my position. I remember you having real trouble with the fact that the $ paid was for court-ordered exchanges of information, and that I didn't conclude this was pay for censorship.
 
Turns out the fbi and cia were, and are, in twit for a good reason. I would have censored the hunter pics to! they have nothing to do with nothing... but russia.
 
Your "Dunk on Elon" to "Criticize FBI Involement in Twitter" ratio is about 10:1

JFC, what is your deal?

As a kid, I thought the FBI was cool. That was shattered a long time ago, and I made a big deal about it at the time to anybody who would listen for the years that followed, and now I don't talk about it that much because excitement over the topic wanes, especially as you realize nothing is ever going to change. It's new to you, and the narrative fits your biases, so you're still excited about it. I get it.

I thought Musk was cool until a few months ago, and it's still an interesting topic to me.

Please don't ever confuse the attention I give something as a representation of its importance to me. I'm usually more interested in what people are saying about things than what is actually happening. Politics are depressing. Immigration, foreign policy, spending, etc. are my highest priorities, but you don't see me often in threads about those topics because they are too depressing.
 
Just because I hate the FBI and think private companies can censor on their platforms doesn't mean I'm not going to try to get to the truth of the matter. I know this can be confusing for some people who just want to flame everything they don't like for whatever reason.

Link to the bolded, please. I don't know what you're referencing, but I would guess this is the 1000th time your bias didn't allow you to see the nuance of my position. I remember you having real trouble with the fact that the $ paid was for court-ordered exchanges of information, and that I didn't conclude this was pay for censorship.

I remember you seeing an elephant shaped hole in a picture and then concluding that there's no way of knowing if it is an elephant that we're not seeing.
 
JFC, what is your deal?

As a kid, I thought the FBI was cool. That was shattered a long time ago, and I made a big deal about it at the time to anybody who would listen for the years that followed, and now I don't talk about it that much because excitement over the topic wanes, especially as you realize nothing is ever going to change.

I thought Musk was cool until a few months ago, and it's still an interesting topic to me.

Please don't ever confuse the attention I give something as a representation of its importance to me. I'm usually more interested in what people are saying about things than what is actually happening. Politics are depressing. Immigration, foreign policy, spending, etc. are my highest priorities, but you don't see me often in threads about those topics because they are too depressing.

Don’t you know that if in every post about any topic that you do not mention every other happening (and state your opinions on them) then that means you do not care about those others topics and your position will be assumed
 
It's new to you, and the narrative fits your biases, so you're still excited about it. I get it.

Could you sound like a more self important pompous a$$? I think I struck a nerve with my ratio comment. Hit a little too close to your "nothing but pure reason and unbiased objectivity" delusion you maintain about yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123 and hog88

VN Store



Back
Top