RIP Twitter

#7,226
#7,226
CobbVol said:
So before the Twitter Files, you already knew that our government and Big Tech were working together to censor?
Click to expand...

Yes, we all knew that. I am almost 100% positive that in its initial explanation of the laptop censorship, Twitter told the public it was because the FBI indicated it was a hack, and this went against Twitter's policy. That info definitely came out long before the Twitter files did. Twitter didn't get a message from the FBI saying "Censor this" it was a message saying, "this was a hack and goes against your policy" and naturally, Twitter said, "Oh yeah, we uphold our policies here."

Twitter did nothing wrong. The FBI, who I distrusted and have been pushing to abolish for nearly 20 years, is the party who did wrong.
 
Last edited:
#7,228
#7,228
n_huffhines said:
We knew this. We knew they mass suspended accounts just for having the wrong follows (qanon types). My friend got suspended for his follows. Musk hasn't welcomed him back yet, btw.
Click to expand...

Remember? I do.

My buddy's still not back on Twitter, BTW. Censorship lord and savior Musk didn't want those guys back, I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#7,232
#7,232
C-south said:
Who gives a s***? You have an unhealthy obsession with this man. All of you looney leftists conveniently ignore all other outlets that have run cover for your heroes all these years.
Click to expand...

Who gives a **** about complete information? I'm not at all surprised that you don't.
 
#7,233
#7,233
n_huffhines said:
Why didn't Elon release everything?
Click to expand...
Sometimes Twitter has to “selectively edit” tweets for the sake of time and clarity.

Rest assured, it does not affect Twitter’s commitment to informing the American public accurately, and any assertion to the contrary is not only false, it is a dangerous attack on our revered institutions that must be stopped.
 
#7,234
#7,234
Ritzwatch said:
Sometimes Twitter has to “selectively edit” tweets for the sake of time and clarity.

Rest assured, it does not affect Twitter’s commitment to informing the American public accurately, and any assertion to the contrary is not only false, it is a dangerous attack on our revered institutions that must be stopped.
Click to expand...

Huh? Did you mean to respond to the post you quoted? That post wasn't about "selective edits" or edits/censorship at all.
 
#7,236
#7,236
n_huffhines said:
Yes, we all knew that. I am almost 100% positive that in its initial explanation of the laptop censorship, Twitter told the public it was because the FBI indicated it was a hack, and this went against Twitter's policy. That info definitely came out long before the Twitter files did. Twitter didn't get a message from the FBI saying "Censor this" it was a message saying, "this was a hack and goes against your policy" and naturally, Twitter said, "Oh yeah, we uphold our policies here."

Twitter did nothing wrong. The FBI, who I distrusted and have been pushing to abolish for nearly 20 years, is the party who did wrong.
Click to expand...
Twitter gladly went along with the corruption with no evidence being provided to them that it was a hack. Then the 51 liars did their job, the debates occurred allowing Biden to lie, and we are still living with the fallout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and InVOLuntary
#7,237
#7,237
n_huffhines said:
Huh? Did you mean to respond to the post you quoted? That post wasn't about "selective edits" or edits/censorship at all.
Click to expand...
🤣

Man, I don’t know the last time I “meant” to do anything on this site.

I use it for levity throughout my day, connection with fellow Vols, and sometimes a little education (of myself more than others.)

Obviously, my attempt at humor didn’t quite land; it sure made sense in my head, though, and it was really funny there, you would have loved it!

Cheers! 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, Vol since 77, n_huffhines and 1 other person
#7,239
#7,239
CobbVol said:
Twitter gladly went along with the corruption with no evidence being provided to them that it was a hack. Then the 51 liars did their job, the debates occurred allowing Biden to lie, and we are still living with the fallout.
Click to expand...

What are you basing this on?

You guys speak like you know. You're so misinformed you thought we found out about this because of the Twitter files, and then you have the audacity to guess at the motivations of the people who made the decision, and you have no idea who the people are or what they have to say about it.

I do know, because I cared about this story a lot, and what the truth is, and listened to an interview with the one person over policy enforcement whose call it was. She explained everything in detail, and that she did not take this decision lightly. You demonize people and you have no fkn clue.

You guys just say whatever is convenient with no care to search for the truth. You probably didn't even know this was one person's decision. You probably think some smoke-filled room of nefarious Twitter crooks made the call from the top. You want the things you say to be true, so you just believe them with absolutely no evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#7,240
#7,240
n_huffhines said:
Yes, we all knew that. I am almost 100% positive that in its initial explanation of the laptop censorship, Twitter told the public it was because the FBI indicated it was a hack, and this went against Twitter's policy. That info definitely came out long before the Twitter files did. Twitter didn't get a message from the FBI saying "Censor this" it was a message saying, "this was a hack and goes against your policy" and naturally, Twitter said, "Oh yeah, we uphold our policies here."

Twitter did nothing wrong. The FBI, who I distrusted and have been pushing to abolish for nearly 20 years, is the party who did wrong.
Click to expand...
So, you're saying Twitter was just an extension of the government agency you don't trust, correct?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#7,242
#7,242
n_huffhines said:
What does that have to do with anything? I am also using StarLink. Some of the points you guys make are bewildering. It's as if you think you have to give 100% approval rating to everybody involved in order to use a service, but I know that's not how you look at the world. I guess this is the wittiest thing you got to say?

Why would I buy that book?
Click to expand...
It is.

IMG_3044.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
#7,243
#7,243
n_huffhines said:
What are you basing this on?

You guys speak like you know. You're so misinformed you thought we found out about this because of the Twitter files, and then you have the audacity to guess at the motivations of the people who made the decision, and you have no idea who the people are or what they have to say about it.

I do know, because I cared about this story a lot, and what the truth is, and listened to an interview with the one person over policy enforcement whose call it was. She explained everything in detail, and that she did not take this decision lightly. You demonize people and you have no fkn clue.

You guys just say whatever is convenient with no care to search for the truth. You probably didn't even know this was one person's decision. You probably think some smoke-filled room of nefarious Twitter crooks made the call from the top. You want the things you say to be true, so you just believe them with absolutely no evidence.
Click to expand...
From testimony of FBI Laura Dehmlow below. Twitter was told early on the laptop was real, yet still went along with the lie.


1729615275882.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Orange_Vol1321
#7,245
#7,245
n_huffhines said:
What are you basing this on?

You guys speak like you know. You're so misinformed you thought we found out about this because of the Twitter files, and then you have the audacity to guess at the motivations of the people who made the decision, and you have no idea who the people are or what they have to say about it.

I do know, because I cared about this story a lot, and what the truth is, and listened to an interview with the one person over policy enforcement whose call it was. She explained everything in detail, and that she did not take this decision lightly. You demonize people and you have no fkn clue.

You guys just say whatever is convenient with no care to search for the truth. You probably didn't even know this was one person's decision. You probably think some smoke-filled room of nefarious Twitter crooks made the call from the top. You want the things you say to be true, so you just believe them with absolutely no evidence.
Click to expand...

Which model Tesla do you own?
 
#7,246
#7,246
CobbVol said:
From testimony of FBI Laura Dehmlow below. Twitter was told early on the laptop was real, yet still went along with the lie.


View attachment 690069
Click to expand...

The laptop can really belong to Biden and still be hacked. Twitter doesn't have a policy about fake laptops. It has a policy about hacked materials. I'm willing to bet this came from the same press release from the house judiciary where you found that:

"Put simply, after the FBI conditioned social media companies to believe that the laptop was the product of a hack-and-dump operation, the Bureau stopped its information sharing, allowing social media companies to conclude that the New York Post story was Russian disinformation.....The FBI had the laptop in their possession since December 2019 and had warned social-media companies to look for a “hack and dump” operation by the Russians prior to the 2020 election. Even after Facebook specifically asked whether the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation, Dehmlow of the FBI refused to comment, resulting in the social-media companies’ suppression of the story."

And to this day, we actually can't say 100% certainty that there was no hack (but that doesn't change the fact that the FBI intentionally misled everyone).
 
#7,248
#7,248
Ok, now I'm triggered. One of the GOAT movies, and we all know Musk liked it because he tried to sell his truck saying "blade runner would drive it."

Screenshot_20241022-133013_Facebook.jpg
 
#7,250
#7,250
Regardless of how one might feel about Elon Musk, it's pretty messed up that our government is holding meetings with British disinformation experts where their top annual priority is repeatedly "Kill Musk's Twitter". Shouldn't someone stand up in those meeting and tell the Brits to pound sand when they advocate 'killing' an American tech giant? Is this the kind of person you want running our country?

www.racket.news

Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"

England, not Russia, is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story, as the leaked Stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Keir Starmer show
www.racket.news www.racket.news
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, Orange_Vol1321, CagleMtnVol and 3 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top