RIP Twitter

#7,276
#7,276
n_huffhines said:
What are you talking about? There have been serious concerns as recent as this year about TikTok getting banned. Facebook/Zuckerberg has been dragged in front of congress several times, and he has haters everywhere. Zuck went scorched earth on past (D) government intervention this year. He's not in the Musk boat because there is littke/no perception that hate speech is a problem on FB rn. Sincerely, WTF?

They probably do care about hate speech. It's like the liberals who say pro-life people don't care about the sanctity of life, they just want to control women's bodies. Two sides of the same coin. People are way more complicated than taking an entire organization and saying none of them have good intentions, and only bad. FFS
Click to expand...
China owns TikTok.

The Congressional hearings with Zuckerberg were dog and pony shows and produced facts that we already knew about FB.

Go post a known fact that makes Kamala look bad on FB right now, and watch what happens to it. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and whodeycin85
#7,277
#7,277
Orange_Vol1321 said:
China owns TikTok.

The Congressional hearings with Zuckerberg were dog and pony shows and produced facts that we already knew about FB.

Go post a known fact that makes Kamala look bad on FB right now, and watch what happens to it. 😉
Click to expand...

Yeah, Twitter is the only SM platform under fire, except all the other exceptions. Cool points, bro.

What are you talking about with the last part? It's clear you have no idea what you're talking about with SM. Absolutely no clue. How does this account even exist if you're right about anything?

1730132019303.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#7,279
#7,279
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, Twitter is the only SM platform under fire, except all the other exceptions. Cool points, bro.

What are you talking about with the last part? It's clear you have no idea what you're talking about with SM. Absolutely no clue. How does this account even exist if you're right about anything?

View attachment 691798
Click to expand...
Not sure of her following on FB but she has 3.6 million on X. Taking down posts of an account this big would be hard to hide for ole Zuck.
In comparison, Kamala's campaign account on X has 1.4 million.


Screenshot_20241028_122733_Chrome.jpg
 
#7,281
#7,281
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, because allowing both sides to have a voice and not picking against the guy who thinks it's OK to grab women by the p***y and deport legal Haitians to Venezuela are exactly the same thing.
Click to expand...
LMAO

"Legal" lol

The Dominican Republic doesn't want their neighbors. Neither should we.
 
#7,282
#7,282
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, because allowing both sides to have a voice and not picking against the guy who thinks it's OK to grab women by the p***y and deport legal Haitians to Venezuela are exactly the same thing.
Click to expand...

It’s not ok to grab women by the *****? How are they “legal”?
 
#7,283
#7,283
C-south said:
It’s not ok to grab women by the *****? How are they “legal”?
Click to expand...

Haha, what? You know how there are legal and illegal immigrants (like how Musk was illegally working at one time, and now he's not)? These ones are legal. Trump would be revoking their status to deport them.

"We can’t confirm the status of every immigrant who has recently moved to the city [Springfield]. But local and state officials said most are there legally because they’re in the US under temporary legal protections, humanitarian parole and temporary protected status."
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#7,284
#7,284
n_huffhines said:
Haha, what? You know how there are legal and illegal immigrants (like how Musk was illegally working at one time, and now he's not)? These ones are legal.
Click to expand...

Deport Musk I don’t care. What made the Haitians “legal”. I bet the people that live in the refugee dumps had no say.
 
#7,285
#7,285
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, because allowing both sides to have a voice and not picking against the guy who thinks it's OK to grab women by the p***y and deport legal Haitians to Venezuela are exactly the same thing.
Click to expand...
Refusing to endorse Kamala isn't the same as endorsing Trump. The only people who see it that way are the "my team vs your team" types. Sane people understand that Kamala hasn't done a damn thing to earn an endorsement. Not being Trump shouldn't be a sufficient condition to earn one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, StarRaider and just bob
#7,286
#7,286
SamRebel35 said:
Refusing to endorse Kamala isn't the same as endorsing Trump. The only people who see it that way are the "my team vs your team" types. Sane people understand that Kamala hasn't done a damn thing to earn an endorsement. Not being Trump shouldn't be a sufficient condition to earn one.
Click to expand...

Nobody said it was.

The point is that not opposing Trump is not even close to the same thing as giving both sides a voice. Not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#7,287
#7,287
n_huffhines said:
Haha, what? You know how there are legal and illegal immigrants (like how Musk was illegally working at one time, and now he's not)? These ones are legal. Trump would be revoking their status to deport them.

"We can’t confirm the status of every immigrant who has recently moved to the city [Springfield]. But local and state officials said most are there legally because they’re in the US under temporary legal protections, humanitarian parole and temporary protected status."
Click to expand...
Revoking their status, thus making them...
 
#7,291
#7,291
n_huffhines said:
LOL, OK. How on earth do you think this point saves the position in any way?

We're only against illegal immigration...and when it's legal immigration, we're against that too. Oh yeah, and send them to the wrong country.
Click to expand...
Temporary protected status. Do you have a dictionary? Do you know what temporary means?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#7,292
#7,292
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Not sure of her following on FB but she has 3.6 million on X. Taking down posts of an account this big would be hard to hide for ole Zuck.
In comparison, Kamala's campaign account on X has 1.4 million.


View attachment 691805
Click to expand...
Twitter is the only social media network under fire except all the other ones, and you can’t make negative comments about Kamala except for the giant account spamming them, because that’s different. Be serious
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
#7,294
#7,294
n_huffhines said:
Nobody said it was.

The point is that not opposing Trump is not even close to the same thing as giving both sides a voice. Not even close.
Click to expand...

Turns out the WaPo didn't endorse a candidate because owner Jeff Bezos decided they wouldn't. The actual journalists of the Post agreed to endorse Kamala and JB swooped in and said "nah" which seems like a perfectly good reason to cancel the Post. Soon thereafter, Bezos met with Trump people. People were wary when he bought it in the first place.
 
Last edited:
#7,295
#7,295
n_huffhines said:
Turns out the WaPo didn't endorse a candidate because owner Jeff Bezos decided they wouldn't. The actual journalists of the Post agreed to endorse Kamala and JB swooped in and said "nah" which seems like a perfectly good reason to cancel the Post. Soon thereafter, Bezos met with Trump people. People were wary when he bought it in the first place.
Click to expand...

Why are you talking to yourself?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, just bob and LSU-SIU
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top