RIP Twitter

[Orangeslice13]

We are strict constructionist on the 2a. Firearms allowed for those in a well regulated militia. Funny how Republicans are holier than thought about adhering to the literal wording of the Constitution... except for the 2a, which they interpret.

And how do you define “a well regulated militia”?
And who is it that regulates that militia?
(Keeping in mind how the federal government argued what in meant in the 1930s during a NFA SCOTUS case)

 

[Orangeburst]

And how do you define “a well regulated militia”?
And who is it that regulates that militia?
(Keeping in mind how the federal government argued what in meant in the 1930s during a NFA SCOTUS case)

LG supports well armed militias. Good to know

 

[luthervol]

What is the point of the 2a?

To ensure a well regulated Militia.

 

[Orangeslice13]

And how do you define “a well regulated militia”?
And who is it that regulates that militia?
(Keeping in mind how the federal government argued what in meant in the 1930s during a NFA SCOTUS case)

To ensure a well regulated Militia.

Same question I ask LG.

 

[luthervol]

No..you equate conservatism to racism.

What? I was describing people.

 

[Carl Pickens]

So. What's wrong with using race as a descriptor? Nothing inherently racist about that at all.
We're both white guys.

You can lie to me, but you can’t lie to yourself

 

[Orangeslice13]

And how do you ensure that well regulated militia?
Hint: the internet was to be able to form one at a moment’s notice. How would that be possible?

 

[Orangeslice13]

LG supports well armed militias. Good to know

More importantly he supports ensuring it.

 

[luthervol]

Same question I ask LG.

If it was argued in 1930, then it is obviously up for interpretation.
To me it means rational and reasonable rules and regulations for gun ownership.

 

[luthervol]

You can lie to me, but you can’t lie to yourself

Are you saying you are not white? My bad.

 

[vol445]

Sure I do. Just because we don't view the interpretations the same in no way means you love it and I don't.
That's as asinine as saying someone with a totally literal interpretation of the Bible loves it while someone with a broader interpretation of the Bible hates it.
Absurd.......but only the literalists ever feel that way.......which is very telling if you think about it.

So you are saying you don’t literally believe in the constitution? Not being a smarta$$. Serious question.

 

[Orangeburst]

What? I was describing people.

Ok..now we are getting somewhere. Guess stereotypes are acceptable.

 

[luthervol]

So you are saying you don’t literally believe in the constitution? Not being a smarta$$. Serious question.

I literally believe in the constitution. It's a great framework.

 

[luthervol]

Ok..now we are getting somewhere. Guess stereotypes are acceptable.

Acceptable for what?

 

[vol445]

I literally believe in the constitution. It's a great framework.

Of course you literally believe in it it’s right there for you to see. That’s not what I’m asking. Only people who vaguely answer questions are scared of the answers they give if you think about it.

 

[lawgator1]

And how do you define “a well regulated militia”?
And who is it that regulates that militia?
(Keeping in mind how the federal government argued what in meant in the 1930s during a NFA SCOTUS case)

At the time a well regulated militia was the equivalent of the national guard.

 

[dovervolz]

You can lie to me, but you can’t lie to yourself

Sure he can CP, all Luther knows is how to lie and BS. Even to himself.

 

[luthervol]

So you are saying you don’t literally believe in the constitution? Not being a smarta$$. Serious question.

Of course you literally believe in it it’s right there for you to see. That’s not what I’m asking. Only people who vaguely answer questions are scared of the answers they give if you think about it.

I have to admit, you have me a little confused.
What is it you are actually asking?

 

[VolStrom]

Why does Luthervol look just like Vol445? Something is scary.

 

[Orangeslice13]

If it was argued in 1930, then it is obviously up for interpretation.
To me it means rational and reasonable rules and regulations for gun ownership.

That’s not what the guys who wrote the constitution said. So you support your twisted version of what the constitution means to you?
So you don’t actually support what the people who wrote it meant.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Why does Luthervol look just like Vol445? Something is scary.

Chevy 454 is the antiluther.

 

[Orangeslice13]

At the time a well regulated militia was the equivalent of the national guard.

Wrong again.

 

[Orangeslice13]

LG won’t answer this question because it’s devastating to his beliefs.

The ninth circuit just ruled less than a year ago that the garbage the left is pushing in gun control is in fact unconstitutional.

 

[Orangeslice13]

I’ll check back in the morning to see what LG1 finds on google

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Twitter 'whistleblower' leaks video of Dorsey telling staff actions will be 'much bigger' than Trump ban

'This is going to be much bigger than just one account, and it’s going to go on for much longer than just this day,' CEO says

Project Veritas has released a video featuring Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey talking about how social media censorship “is not going away any time soon.” Dorsey says in the video that the company should be considering a “Much broader approach” to how it manages conversations on its platform.

“We are focused on one account [President Trump] right now, but this is going to be much bigger than just one account, and it’s going to go on for much longer than just this day, this week, and the next few weeks, and go on beyond the inauguration,” said Dorsey in the video.

“We have to expect that we have to be ready for that,” continued the Twitter CEO. “So, the focus is certainly on this account, and how it ties to real-world violence.”

“But also, we need to think much longer-term around how these dynamics play out over time,” added Dorsey. “I don’t believe this is going away any time soon. And the moves that we’re making today around QAnon for instance, is one such example of a much broader approach that we should be looking at, and going deeper on.”

Project Veritas Video Shows Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Saying Censorship Is Not 'Going Away Anytime Soon'