RIP Twitter

Gosh, if there were just some way to get our hands on deal docs. Maybe if there was a sec database, let's call it Edgar, where we could find those. Yeah, that would be awesome.

DEFA14A

From your link
Section 4.6 Company SEC Documents; Financial Statements.

(a) Since January 1, 2022, the Company has filed or furnished with the SEC all material forms, documents and reports required to be filed or furnished prior to the date of this Agreement by it with the SEC (such forms, documents and reports filed with the SEC, including any amendments or supplements thereto and any exhibits or other documents attached to or incorporated by reference therein, the “Company SEC Documents”). As of their respective dates, or, if amended or supplemented, as of the date of the last such amendment or supplement, the Company SEC Documents complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and none of the Company SEC Documents at the time it was filed (or, if amended or supplemented, as of the date of the last amendment or supplement) contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, or are to be made, not misleading.

0001418091-22-000075 (d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net) Page 33 of their SEC filings show daily users

If they knowingly reported active users that included 20% bots (as an example) then they mislead their shareholders and the buyer.
 
Well since negotiating M&A deals is what I do, pretty much anything. Some transactions actually have no due diligence clauses, particularly insider deals. Boilerplate provisions are rare in the mega-transactions. It can be an amazing thing to watch the top transactional attorneys put a contract together. Observed one attorney out of Chicago basically dictate an entire 120 page contract over the course of 3 days on a $35+ million deal with banks, mezzanine lenders and a hedge fund involved. Stunning intellect.
I think all you really did is point to the fact many of your clients are morons.
 
I think all you really did is point to the fact many of your clients are morons.

Of course you would be able to say that not knowing a damn thing about what I do and how to do it. I do know you don't know what or how to do it otherwise I would know you. Like railroad transactions, it's a very closed universe. You're clearly the idiot here.
 
Of course you would be able to say that not knowing a damn thing about what I do and how to do it. I do know you don't know what or how to do it otherwise I would know you. Like railroad transactions, it's a very closed universe. You're clearly the idiot here.
Lol. Ok.
 
From your link
Section 4.6 Company SEC Documents; Financial Statements.

(a) Since January 1, 2022, the Company has filed or furnished with the SEC all material forms, documents and reports required to be filed or furnished prior to the date of this Agreement by it with the SEC (such forms, documents and reports filed with the SEC, including any amendments or supplements thereto and any exhibits or other documents attached to or incorporated by reference therein, the “Company SEC Documents”). As of their respective dates, or, if amended or supplemented, as of the date of the last such amendment or supplement, the Company SEC Documents complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and none of the Company SEC Documents at the time it was filed (or, if amended or supplemented, as of the date of the last amendment or supplement) contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, or are to be made, not misleading.

0001418091-22-000075 (d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net) Page 33 of their SEC filings show daily users

If they knowingly reported active users that included 20% bots (as an example) then they mislead their shareholders and the buyer.
EL has left the chat
 
My first thought was that sounded like a stretch. I didn't read the bill, but this article would have me believe it is indeed a stretch.
Social media companies can’t ban Texans over political viewpoints under new law

Yeah - it's a stretch and a stupid claim

The bill would not restrict social media platforms from removing “offensively violent material” or penalize companies for blocking criminal activity or threatened violence. It would also allow the removal of content to prevent the sexual exploitation of children.
 
Who had "Elon Musk replying with a poop emoji to Twitter CEO to blow up deal he should have never gotten himself into" on their 2022 bingo card?


Elon Musk is having second thoughts about the price tag, it seems. That would be understandable, if he hadn't been the one to make $54.20 a share such a public offer to begin with.

The Market Has Doubts Musk Will Buy Twitter at $54.20

Elon Musk is using a 'dog ate the homework' excuse to potentially back out of buying Twitter and there is now a less than 50% chance the deal gets done, Wedbush says
 
God, I love being right. Told you knuckledraggers this thing was gonna be a disaster for Musky boy. Hubris/chutzpa is a helluva drug.

 

VN Store



Back
Top