creekdipper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Messages
- 8,617
- Likes
- 23,185
That has absolutely nothing to do with my post. Sorry you missed the contextSo a woman’s irresponsibly gives her a right to kill a human life. A man’s irresponsibility in the same scenario could render him living paycheck to paycheck for 18+ years to support that woman’s lifestyle based on her initial decision. Two parties are involved yet one holds all marbles.
The idea that a man knows the best option for a rape victim.
I too am interested in the definition of “radical Christianity”
No disagreement here.View attachment 468219
It surely defies the crude labeling contest folks play on the internet. The overly simple meme above is generically correct, and humorous, but there are quite wide divides in the second two panels.
Anyone who has trouble with people in panel one is unreasonable; this is where the great majority of people in all religions reside and the best of them are the sort of people whose deeds in life make them admirable to others. As Jesus said, "You shall know them by their fruits." Though I don't get to church much anymore, I still hold those teachings close and try to lead by example, i.e. grow good fruit.
The next two panels are where things slide from wrong-headed at the mildest extreme, so no big deal, to terrorists at the furthest extreme, which is potentially an existential threat to a society. These panels are progressively less populated though the meme splits them into thirds.
Unfortunately, any dogma, ethos, politics or worldview can be susceptible to this same sliding scale, especially in a highly Puritanical society like ours. Perhaps this is one of America's weaknesses. Our unique freedoms, our natural iconoclastic sentiments, along with our ability to ramp up unreasonable anger via various identity politics has led to violence great and small. Yet the structure the architects built survived even the Civil War and its aftermath, so perhaps we should not spend as much time worried about the often very slight ways in which we are different and instead focus on all the truly revolutionary ways in which we are the same.
View attachment 468219
It surely defies the crude labeling contest folks play on the internet. The overly simple meme above is generically correct, and humorous, but there are quite wide divides in the second two panels.
Anyone who has trouble with people in panel one is unreasonable; this is where the great majority of people in all religions reside and the best of them are the sort of people whose deeds in life make them admirable to others. As Jesus said, "You shall know them by their fruits." Though I don't get to church much anymore, I still hold those teachings close and try to lead by example, i.e. grow good fruit.
The next two panels are where things slide from wrong-headed at the mildest extreme, so no big deal, to terrorists at the furthest extreme, which is potentially an existential threat to a society. These panels are progressively less populated though the meme splits them into thirds.
Unfortunately, any dogma, ethos, politics or worldview can be susceptible to this same sliding scale, especially in a highly Puritanical society like ours. Perhaps this is one of America's weaknesses. Our unique freedoms, our natural iconoclastic sentiments, along with our ability to ramp up unreasonable anger via various identity politics has led to violence great and small. Yet the structure the architects built survived even the Civil War and its aftermath, so perhaps we should not spend as much time worried about the often very slight ways in which we are different and instead focus on all the truly revolutionary ways in which we are the same.
No disagreement here.
I’d still like to hear his definition though
I’d point out that I am not a Christian in most definitions.