Romney

[milohimself]

(sarcasm noted)

I do. I like for them to make reasoned choices to change positions. It helps if they do so when it could cost them something. My issue with Romney is that all of his "changes of mind" seem to benefit him politically for whatever he's trying to attain.

But I also don't think there's really very much question about who he is at the core. He is a Progressive, establishment Republican. With Bush the term "big gov't conservative" was applied. He believes in big gov't and central control but differs with Dems on how to use it and who should mainly benefit.

Some of LG's accusations actually apply to these guys... concerning favor to the rich.

Generally agree. If there's one thing TP'ers and lefties can agree on, it's why establishment Republicans suck.

There is a differnce in a candidate changing their mind about an issue over a period of time and a candidate that has a history of changing his stance on a number of issues depending on the office he/she is running for.

I know Mitt's the definition of amorphous, was just just keeeeeding.

 

[gsvol]

Generally agree. If there's one thing TP'ers and lefties can agree on, it's why establishment Republicans suck.


I know Mitt's the definition of amorphous, was just just keeeeeding.

They disagree on why Dhimmirats suck though.

Unctuous may be the word for which you are searching.

 

[zjcvols]

Reagan is dead, he isnt coming back and nobody currently in the Tea Party is even remotely close to being Reagan-esque. If you sit at home and dont Vote, you are saying "I am content with the current Administration"

Or you realize that no matter who is in office, they are just a bunch of elitist rich men who only look after themselves.

 

[KiffinKiller]

Or you realize that no matter who is in office, they are just a bunch of elitist rich men who only look after themselves.

welcome, speaker of truth.