Rumbles of Truth...

#126
#126
I literally posted exampled of actual historical record.....I am not aware of any such evidence of flat earth. DO you honestly feel your response comes off as intelligent instead of ignorant and stubborn?
 
#127
#127
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
I literally posted exampled of actual historical record.....I am not aware of any such evidence of flat earth. DO you honestly feel your response comes off as intelligent instead of ignorant and stubborn?
Click to expand...
Lol, how many “examples of actual historical record” were creating Cat 5 hurricanes out of nothing? (“None, but that was in a 3-hour video I watched of some random guy talking to his 8 YouTube followers”)
 
#129
#129
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
You are such a good example of, “It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.”
Click to expand...
Shocked this guy didn’t answer my question when we both know what the answer is
NashVol11 said:
Lol, how many “examples of actual historical record” were creating Cat 5 hurricanes out of nothing?
Click to expand...
 
#130
#130
NashVol11 said:
Shocked this guy didn’t answer my question when we both know what the answer is
Click to expand...
I absolutely do know the answer. You however obviously do not despite your smug certainty.

Not rumble..YT.....but since we're on the topic.




That climate manipulations technology exists, and is being used currently is beyond dispute for anyone who does even a basic search..hell there patents full of the technology, and even private companies in the buisiness. Dubai recently is a perfect example of a nation state admitting to it, and it getting out of hand.

The only real question is when and where has it been used and to what extent. I make no claims on that. The initial post here was a rumble video of a whistleblower with firsthand knowledge of some of the chemicals used. The question on second video was COULD it be used that way. Sure of course it could. Has it? Well That is up to others to find out. But you just reflexively laugh off the things you have no knowledge of.
 
Last edited:
#132
#132
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
The only real question is when and where has it been used and to what extent. I make no claims on that. The initial post here was a rumble video of a whistleblower with firsthand knowledge of some of the chemicals used. The question on second video was COULD it be used that way. Sure of course it could. Has it? Well That is up to others to find out. But you just reflexively laugh off the things you have no knowledge of.
Click to expand...
So the answer to my question was that no, there’s zero indication of some hurricane machine creating a Cat 5 out of nothing, and this is all bull**** innuendo about how it “could” happen with not even a shred of evidence that this hurricane is manufactured. Hilarious for you to watch 7 hours of conspiracy videos just to end up here
 
#133
#133
I literally posted a link to Cirrus. Don't ask questions your then too lazy to read or watch the answer to.This is par for the course with you, try and rephrase a simpleton question, and then give a simpleton response. And never take any time to actually educate yourself. Cirrus was an example where they did redirect a hurricaine (by accident). The point is it has been done at least once that we know of and it was admitted at the time.

"Project Cirrus was the first attempt to modify a hurricane. It was a collaboration of the General Electric Corporation, the US Army Signal Corps, the Office of Naval Research, and the US Air Force.[1] After several preparations and initial skepticism by government scientists,[6] the first attempt to modify a hurricane began on October 13, 1947 on Hurricane Cape Sable that was heading west to east and out to sea....

... At first the seeding was officially denied and it took years before the government admitted it. According to the Sept. 12, 1965 edition of the Fort Lauderdale News and Sun-Sentinel, in 1947 a hurricane "went whacky" and "Twelve years later it was admitted the storm had in fact been seeded."

Read MF...it's not my job to stop gap your inability at reading comprehension, or to learn before just making a blanket unifnormed statement. GIMF
 
#134
#134
CAT rating has literally nothing to do with any statement here, or any video posted. that's some BS criteria you interjected.
 
#136
#136
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
I literally posted a link to Cirrus. Don't ask questions your then too lazy to read or watch the answer to.This is par for the course with you, try and rephrase a simpleton question, and then give a simpleton response. And never take any time to actually educate yourself. Cirrus was an example where they did redirect a hurricaine (by accident). The point is it has been done at least once that we know of and it was admitted at the time.

"Project Cirrus was the first attempt to modify a hurricane. It was a collaboration of the General Electric Corporation, the US Army Signal Corps, the Office of Naval Research, and the US Air Force.[1] After several preparations and initial skepticism by government scientists,[6] the first attempt to modify a hurricane began on October 13, 1947 on Hurricane Cape Sable that was heading west to east and out to sea....

... At first the seeding was officially denied and it took years before the government admitted it. According to the Sept. 12, 1965 edition of the Fort Lauderdale News and Sun-Sentinel, in 1947 a hurricane "went whacky" and "Twelve years later it was admitted the storm had in fact been seeded."

Read MF...it's not my job to stop gap your inability at reading comprehension, or to learn before just making a blanket unifnormed statement. GIMF
Click to expand...
“Wikipedia tells me that someone tried to redirect a hurricane, so therefore this Cat 5 which shows no signs of being unnaturally redirected was probably created by the magic hurricane machine. Google it”

Lmao
 
#137
#137
So I am done with that, and arguing with someone who is incapable of basic reading skills, but to continue with Rumbles of Truth...

 
#138
#138
NashVol11 said:
“Wikipedia tells me that someone tried to redirect a hurricane, so therefore this Cat 5 which shows no signs of being unnaturally redirected was probably created by the magic hurricane machine. Google it”

Lmao
Click to expand...
I never made that statement, neither did any of the posted videos. that's all you friend. You made a strawman and then attacked it, congratualtions at lowbrow debate cop outs.
 
#139
#139
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
I never made that statement, neither did any of the posted videos. that's all you friend.
Click to expand...
That’s the point, you’re not making ANY statement. Just “hey, it COULD happen” with (like I said) not a shred of evidence that this hurricane is man made or man-directed. All of the “just asking questions” conspiracy people have zero substance like this
 
#140
#140
NashVol11 said:
That’s the point, you’re not making ANY statement. Just “hey, it COULD happen” with (like I said) not a shred of evidence that this hurricane is man made or man-directed
Click to expand...
I did not mention this hurricaine. Not once. This thread is simply about "rumbles of truth" i.e. often censored topics on other platforms. I posted it because people had suggested it as a psossibility, and dumb MFers like you compare it to flat earth, and moon cheese because you clearly know nothing about the topic. The entire intent was showing it has been done, the technology does exist, and it is possible. Wether or not it has happened recently or this hurricaine was never stated here. Merely showing that the tech has existed and continues.
 
#144
#144
NashVol11 said:
People would rather believe in a secret hurricane machine than believe the water is getting warmer
Click to expand...
Ahh yes, the great hurricane machine constructed by Bill Gates and partially funded by Al Gore & George Soros during the early 2000s. The world has been a much more dangerous place ever since.
 
#145
#145



Why Truth Angers People​


The truth can anger people for several reasons:
  • Inconvenient Reality: The truth often reveals uncomfortable or inconvenient facts, forcing individuals to confront their own biases, beliefs, or behaviors. This can lead to defensiveness, denial, or even anger.
  • Threat to Identity: When confronted with the truth, people may feel their sense of self or identity is being challenged. This can trigger emotional responses, including anger, as individuals struggle to maintain their ego or worldview.
  • Fear of Change: The truth can imply a need for change or adjustment, which can be unsettling and even anger-inducing. People may resist the truth because it requires them to adapt to new information or perspectives.
  • Suppressed Emotions: When people suppress their angry emotions, they can become externalized and manifest in indirect ways, such as passive-aggression or withholding. This can lead to feelings of frustration, resentment, and even anger towards others or situations.
  • Lack of Emotional Regulation: Some individuals may struggle to regulate their emotions, particularly anger, leading to intense and disproportionate reactions to the truth.
  • Cognitive Dissonance: When people encounter information that conflicts with their existing beliefs or values, it can create cognitive dissonance. This mental discomfort can manifest as anger or defensiveness as individuals attempt to reconcile the new information with their preconceived notions.
  • Power Dynamics: The truth can also anger people when it challenges their sense of power or control. For example, revelations of wrongdoing or abuse of authority can evoke strong emotions, including anger, as individuals feel their power or status is being undermined.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top