Russell's opposite was often 5'7".....At times it looked like she was playing against grade school kids...When she set screens at times she had to squat down....
Japan was the better team.
So Mercedes just looked good due to weak competition? All I can get are her scores and rebounds and they look great, can't see anything to compare :-(
I was hoping she had "found" her game.
So Mercedes just looked good due to weak competition? All I can get are her scores and rebounds and they look great, can't see anything to compare :-(
I was hoping she had "found" her game.
Then why didn't they win?
On paper it was a size mismatch like I have never seen before.
When your opponent has a 5'7" center and you have a size advantage at every position, and it takes two overtimes to win, that is not a great victory.
The better team does not always win. They played team ball, while we played some form of individual exhibition that was ahead when time ran out the second time..
Do you think it was because they just had not been together very long whereas the Japanese was more established? An "individul exhibition" type game would normally make me think the players were not team players or the coaches were not doing their jobs. But these girls were only together a couple of weeks weren't they?
Also just wondering what you, and volnationnj, think of the coach. I had never heard of him and was surprised a better known coach was not chosen. Of course the best coach in the nation could be at an unknown school. I got to see very little of the games, but the defense and passing (as in assists) seemed weak.
Our offense was mostly the guards dribble down the court and take a shot.....With our huge height advantage we usually got a second shot...Is it a good strategy, against a short team it seems to work....
We did set a few double high post screens at the top of the key, which was the only semblance of an organized offensive attack I saw....In one of these screens, Russell had to actually squat down to screen her player....I have never seen that before, as a player or as an observer, I actually laughed out loud.
The opponents have had more time together, which was evident by their crisp ball movement, and excellent low post screens that allowed many uncontested drives to the baskets by their very quick guards. Their guard play was magnificent. Ours was sporadic, at best.
I know nothing about our coach....He is undefeated so far, but he remains a mystery to me. His team is playing for the gold, so he is doing something right.
If you have a DVR, set it to record the next game, which I believe is tomorrow morning at 5AM (EST) on ESPNU..If not get up early and watch some of the game....Canada is as big as we are, if not bigger, and will be able to bang on the boards with us.
In closing, the game against Japan reminded me of the old King Kong movie, when Kong was swatting at the planes as they flew by....Their little guards would dart right by us and we would swipe at em....good stuff.
The coach is in a difficult position. He has, what appears to be, a lot of players who think shoot first. Add to that a limited amount of time together and when you play a team that's been together for a lot longer (Japan), it spells trouble. It's difficult to determine if it's the players or the coach who is more responsible for the level of play. My guess, it's the players.