Russia Already Interfering With 2020 Election: Seeks to Re-Elect Trump

This isn't true. Nobody is blaming Trump for Russia's intrusion. We are blaming Trump for publicly siding with Vladimir Putin's denial at the press conference in Helsinki. If Trump actually believed that Russia didn't hack the DNC, then why did he backtrack the very next day with his claim that he had merely misspoken? That was pathetic. Those of you who still believe that Russia didn't hack the DNC are ignorant... or just plain delusional.
I'm not saying Russia didn't hack the DNC. I'm saying that's not Trump's problem. That's the problem of the DNC. It was reported, the FBI attempted an investigation(although they were denied access to the servers), and it's in the past.

I guess Trump could ask them to knock it off. Would that make it better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and AM64
I’ve got some bad news , they probably won’t ever stop trying to sow discord among nations they are at odds with . Neither will any country including us . Yes I said it ... INCLUDING US .

Funny how all those Obama loving Europeans could pimp for him all day long, and nobody complained. I'll bet even the Russians loved the way Obama would roll over for them, but you know any sane person would draw the line at having to listen to Hiliary screech ... probably has halitosis to go along with it. It's amazing how our fickle libs have railed about our CIA meddling - including putting kings or other dictators in place, but now it's like meddling in another country's politics has never happened until Trump was the supposed "beneficiary".
 
Your own candidates are saying this . This isn’t just the Rs complaint . We are just pointing out what happened and what’s being said by others . Literally the Dem candidates are complaining about him buying his way in .
Then they are being disingenuous and trying to manipulate the gullible.
 
I'm not saying Russia didn't hack the DNC. I'm saying that's not Trump's problem. That's the problem of the DNC. It was reported, the FBI attempted an investigation(although they were denied access to the servers), and it's in the past.

I guess Trump could ask them to knock it off. Would that make it better?

It worked for Barry
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and AM64
Wow. You really are dense. You should have watched the debate, then you would have seen the other candidates call it out for what it was. I guess by skipping it, you get to create your own fantasy, pretty much like you always do.
As I just said. They are being disingenuous and trying to mislead the gullible.
 
lmao The DNC changed their rules to let him in. But you may be hitting on something with that comment about gullible people.
Oh there are certainly gullible on both sides. Of course they changed the rules to let him in.
The point is THEY SHOULD HAVE CHANGED THE RULES TO LET HIM IN.
The rules were made obsolete by him funding his own campaign.
If funding your own campaign is not illegal, then rules should not be in place that prohibit someone who is legally funding their campaign from participating in debates. That would make absolutely zero sense.
 
That's like saying that if Trump were not rich, he never would have run for president. It's sort of a duh....

No. that's saying he bought his way in and the only reason he's there. Trump raises more than plenty donations. The Republican coffers are dwarfing what the dems have on hand.
 
Which is what I was referencing. Obama was President when all of this happened and he did nothing. Yet they want to hang it all over Trump's head.
Baby steps. First we have to get some people to acknowledge Russia did what they are accused of and the Trump Campaign did what they are accused of. Which one are you stuck on, FISA abuse or Hoax?
 
Oh there are certainly gullible on both sides. Of course they changed the rules to let him in.
The point is THEY SHOULD HAVE CHANGED THE RULES TO LET HIM IN.
The rules were made obsolete by him funding his own campaign.
If funding your own campaign is not illegal, then rules should not be in place that prohibit someone who is legally funding their campaign from participating in debates. That would make absolutely zero sense.

I still think you're glossing over the point that the left acted in a way that totally contradicts what they have claimed to believe. They demonstrated a great deal of hypocrisy. You're trying to defend and deflect, but it's still hypocrisy. And people are laughing about it being so obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and 37L1
Baby steps. First we have to get some people to acknowledge Russia did what they are accused of and the Trump Campaign did what they are accused of. Which one are you stuck on, FISA abuse or Hoax?

So you're trying to write a fairy tale.
 
No. that's saying he bought his way in and the only reason he's there. Trump raises more than plenty donations. The Republican coffers are dwarfing what the dems have on hand.
He would have never been in a position to run were he not rich.
 
So say you.

I can say this though. Your posts look like they have been written by someone with a learning disability, poor thing.

If you weren't aware, and I'm pretty sure you aren't very aware, those are lyrics from the song "I'd Love To Change The World" by Ten Years After.

Weird. I have actually heard that song many times and did not pick up on it. Alvin Lee was a fine guitarist, may he RIP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
I still think you're glossing over the point that the left acted in a way that totally contradicts what they have claimed to believe. They demonstrated a great deal of hypocrisy. You're trying to defend and deflect, but it's still hypocrisy. And people are laughing about it being so obvious.
luther frequently trips over the obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
He would have never been in a position to run were he not rich.
The exact point the other candidates are making. In case you've missed it, they've been railing against the rich. Are you sure you support these people?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top