Russia Already Interfering With 2020 Election: Seeks to Re-Elect Trump

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

To report the truth? I don't think so.
The difference is, Obama would have been interested in actually hearing the truth.

Total BS.....keep the BS coming w/all the lies you can think up. If anything, Obama ran from the truth.

 

[luthervol]

As the boss, he's the office definer. Unless you want to cite consitution or legislation wrapped around the protocols you took issue with, you're just advertising butt-hurt.

pro·to·col
1.
the official procedure or system of rules governing affairs of state or diplomatic occasions.
"protocol forbids the prince from making any public statement in his defense"

We have 240 years of established presidential protocol.

 

[Orange_Crush]

pro·to·col
1.
the official procedure or system of rules governing affairs of state or diplomatic occasions.
"protocol forbids the prince from making any public statement in his defense"

We have 240 years of established presidential protocol.

What's missing in this post is what's actually interesting.

You can't list law or constitution, so you list 240 years of supposed president-created tradition to prove that the president doesn't have the right to set protocol.

I have to give you credit. That's a bold strategy.

I'll ask again... Can you list law or constitution that limit Trump per the protocols you took issue with? Or will you just continue to advertise your fragile sensibilities?

 

[DancingOutlaw]

Look into this meme. You are getting the urge to vote for Trump. Keep looking, that’s it. Feel your true patriotism coming to the surface.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

President Trump over Comrade Sanders? Makes no sense.

 

[vols40]

When is the report of European interference for the Dems coming? Luther keeps saying how our allies hate Trump and don't want him reelected. If that's known, sounds like interference to me. Why isn't the intelligence community out in front on that?

Seriously, unless you can show actual voting machines are getting hacked, everyone needs to shut up about this "influencing" crap because Russia is far from the only one doing it.

It's getting more difficult to prove voting irregularities so they are on to the next fake crisis that they can bitch and complain about but never prove

 

[luthervol]

What's missing in this post is what's actually interesting.

You can't list law or constitution, so you list 240 years of supposed president-created tradition to prove that the president doesn't have the right to set protocol.

I have to give you credit. That's a bold strategy.

I'll ask again... Can you list law or constitution that limit Trump per the protocols you took issue with? Or will you just continue to advertise your fragile sensibilities?

The protocols were already set. That's sort of the point.
Does he have to follow set protocols?
Obviously not. That was also sort of the point.
Go back to my original statement and re-calibrate your argument.

 

[vols40]

President Trump over Comrade Sanders? Makes no sense.

Because Bern was exposed and called a Communist last night and his only response was fake outrage and a "that was a low shot" response

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

The protocols were already set. That's sort of the point.
Does he have to follow set protocols?
Obviously not. That was also sort of the point.

Secretary Hillary Clinton certainly set that standard to a new level.

 

[vols40]

Can we merge this into Cougs Russian interference thread seeing as LG started the exact same thread after Cougs?

 

[JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!]

The New York Times is a pitiful rag.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

The New York Times is a pitiful rag.

Why do you think they give it away?

 

[Orange_Crush]

The protocols were already set. That's sort of the point.
Does he have to follow set protocols?
Obviously not. That was also sort of the point.
Go back to my original statement and re-calibrate your argument.

I've followed your argument just fine. Perhaps you've forgotten it so far?

Is it? And since when did Trump ever give a damn about following protocol?
He is the last person to concern himself with protocol.
It's protocol to have daily White House briefings.
It's protocol to publicly take the word of your intelligence agencies over your enemy.
It's protocol to let the Attorney General do his job without public interference.

Maybe the guy knew that if he briefed the White House they (Trump) would once again try to twist and suppress the truth.

He's an office holder, not an office definer.

You've said that Trump hasn't given a damn about following protocol.

You listed a bunch of things that offend your sensibilities.

You then posted as though you believe the president doesn't get to define protocol.

Then...

pro·to·col
1.
the official procedure or system of rules governing affairs of state or diplomatic occasions.
"protocol forbids the prince from making any public statement in his defense"

We have 240 years of established presidential protocol.

Instead of posting the legal bindings around the protocols that you claimed the president doesn't get to define, you referenced ~240 years of presidents defining protocol.

To translate it into your language.. You claimed the president isn't an office definer and then referenced 240 years of presidential definition.

 

[C-south]

To report the truth? I don't think so.
The difference is, Obama would have been interested in actually hearing the truth.

So he could say it was a lie?

 

[luthervol]

Amy Berman Jackson, judge in Roger Stone, case rebukes Trump-backed conspiracies - CNNPolitics

Before, during and after the sentencing hearing, Trump promoted some of the same conspiracy theories that Jackson methodically dismantled while explaining her decision to send Stone to prison for more than three years.
And before the end of the day, Trump teased the eventual possibility of pardoning Stone, his longtime friend and political booster.

For about 50 intense minutes on Thursday, Jackson highlighted Stone's crimes and condemned the scorched-earth politics that he and Trump championed for years, most recently in 2016.
Along the way, she debunked no fewer than five conspiracy theories that have found a home on Trump's Twitter feed, conservative media outlets and Stone's allies on the fringes of the Internet.

Read the whole article, it's informative.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Who cares at this point. They probably are, but is it going to make a huge difference? I doubt it. Every big country is going to try one way or another. It's time to let it go and embrace our lovable, stupid Trumpy Bear for another term.

Funny.
But sad all at the same time

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

"Intelligence officials warned House lawmakers last week that Russia was interfering in the 2020 campaign to try to get President Trump re-elected"

Russia Backs Trump’s Re-election, and He Fears Democrats Will Exploit Its Support

I'd say every country will back President Trumps reelection.


Well, not Iran.

 

[luthervol]

So he could say it was a lie?

That is Trump's method.

 

[ajvol01]

"Intelligence officials warned House lawmakers last week that Russia was interfering in the 2020 campaign to try to get President Trump re-elected"

Russia Backs Trump’s Re-election, and He Fears Democrats Will Exploit Its Support

You’re really buying this garbage? Unbelievable

 

[JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!]

Amy Berman Jackson, judge in Roger Stone, case rebukes Trump-backed conspiracies - CNNPolitics

Before, during and after the sentencing hearing, Trump promoted some of the same conspiracy theories that Jackson methodically dismantled while explaining her decision to send Stone to prison for more than three years.
And before the end of the day, Trump teased the eventual possibility of pardoning Stone, his longtime friend and political booster.

For about 50 intense minutes on Thursday, Jackson highlighted Stone's crimes and condemned the scorched-earth politics that he and Trump championed for years, most recently in 2016.
Along the way, she debunked no fewer than five conspiracy theories that have found a home on Trump's Twitter feed, conservative media outlets and Stone's allies on the fringes of the Internet.

Read the whole article, it's informative.

An article by Marshall Cohen put out by CNN ? Good grief, graffiti in a convenience store restroom would be more informative.

 

[luthervol]

I've followed your argument just fine. Perhaps you've forgotten it so far?





You've said that Trump hasn't given a damn about following protocol.

You listed a bunch of things that offend your sensibilities.

You then posted as though you believe the president doesn't get to define protocol.

Then...



Instead of posting the legal bindings around the protocols that you claimed the president doesn't get to define, you referenced ~240 years of presidents defining protocol.

To translate it into your language.. You claimed the president isn't an office definer and then referenced 240 years of presidential definition.

So to recap.
I say "since when did Trump give a damn about following protocol."
I then list a number of established protocols Trump ignores.

You then once again run off on some tangent that I quickly shut down.

You then once again resort to some out of order muti-post looking for any triviality you may be able latch onto.

I referenced 240 years of presidents establishing and following protocol.
Can a president refuse to follow established protocol? Certainly, that's exactly what I claimed Trump does.
I

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Because Bern was exposed and called a Communist last night and his only response was fake outrage and a "that was a cheap shot" response

Cheap shot....fyp. That got Bernie all flushed & all out of wack.....Bernie's eyes got all big & defensive.
I was surprised Bernie didn't have a heart attack after Bloom said that.

 

[luthervol]

An article by Marshall Cohen put out by CNN ? Good grief, graffiti in a convenience store restroom would be more informative.

Truth hurts.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Major breach of protocol and if true the guy deserved to be fired.

Is it? And since when did Trump ever give a damn about following protocol?
He is the last person to concern himself with protocol.
It's protocol to have daily White House briefings.
It's protocol to publicly take the word of your intelligence agencies over your enemy.
It's protocol to let the Attorney General do his job without public interference.

Maybe the guy knew that if he briefed the White House they (Trump) would once again try to twist and suppress the truth.

The president sets protocol, not his subordinates.

He's an office holder, not an office definer.

As the boss, he's the office definer. Unless you want to cite consitution or legislation wrapped around the protocols you took issue with, you're just advertising butt-hurt.

pro·to·col
1.
the official procedure or system of rules governing affairs of state or diplomatic occasions.
"protocol forbids the prince from making any public statement in his defense"

We have 240 years of established presidential protocol.

What's missing in this post is what's actually interesting.

You can't list law or constitution, so you list 240 years of supposed president-created tradition to prove that the president doesn't have the right to set protocol.

I have to give you credit. That's a bold strategy.

I'll ask again... Can you list law or constitution that limit Trump per the protocols you took issue with? Or will you just continue to advertise your fragile sensibilities?

That's the conversation verbatim, Skit. And the bold is not some "triviality" that I made up. It's the dumbass comment you're desperately trying to act like you never made.

 

[Weezer]

To report the truth? I don't think so.
The difference is, Obama would have been interested in actually hearing the truth.

Are bold-faced lies your new schtick? It's not hard to cite examples of Obama ignoring the truth.