Russia bounty on US troops

#584
#584
USAFgolferVol said:
Problem is that the people who can do this get fired
Click to expand...

After firing they are threatened to sign N.D.A's to not say anything and /or get labeled by drumpf as unamerican. All the sheeple point and say "yeah unamerican" This is usually followed by drumpf using his small tweeter to assign a sophomoric nickname that wouldn't fly on a middle school playground.

This is called "draining the swamp" hahaha
 
#585
#585
VFFL@THE BEACH said:
After firing they are threatened to sign N.D.A's to not say anything and /or get labeled by drumpf as unamerican. All the sheeple point and say "yeah unamerican" This is usually followed by drumpf using his small tweeter to assign a sophomoric nickname that wouldn't fly on a middle school playground.

This is called "draining the swamp" hahaha
Click to expand...
What middle school has a playground?
 
#587
#587
Mick said:
Why do you ask? Freak.
Click to expand...


You are so asinine that you can't see the irony in someone calling out the President for using childish nicknames while calling the President a childish nickname. It is one of your best qualities.It's why I like you so much.

Since the guy that runs this place is Freak, I'm going to take that as a compliment.
 
#588
#588
A country we're fighting proxy wars with is targeting our troops. They must have gotten the idea from us.
 
#589
#589
Sandman 423 said:
You are so asinine that you can't see the irony in someone calling out the President for using childish nicknames while calling the President a childish nickname. It is one of your best qualities.It's why I like you so much.

Since the guy that runs this place is Freak, I'm going to take that as a compliment.
Click to expand...
It was just a joke, obviously. Don't be so sensitive.
 
#590
#590
Mick said:
It was just a joke, obviously. Don't be so sensitive.
Click to expand...
F2yaII.gif
 
#591
#591
New Pentagon Afghanistan report:

“As of February, the Russian government was working with the central government, regional countries, and the Taliban to gain increased influence in Afghanistan, expedite a US military withdrawal, and address security challenges that might arise. Russia has politically supported the Taliban to cultivate influence with the group, limit the Western military presence, and encourage counter ISIS operations, although Russia publicly denies their involvement.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
#592
#592
You want to "hurt" Russia, take away the pipelines into the MidEast.

It is what bankrupted them during the last of the Cold War, and it is the only thing besides the mafia which keeps that country going. Take away pipelines, take away all threats, but, nuclear basically.
 
#593
#593
BowlBrother85 said:
"If reporting about Russian bounties is true, the White House must explain: 1. Why weren't the president or vice president briefed? 2. Who did know and when? 3. What has been done in response to protect our forces & hold Putin accountable?" - Liz Cheney, Chair of the House Republican Conference.

So, Benghazi warranted a Congressional hearing but this doesn't? Yeah, I see where you're coming from. There are some questions that need to be answered here.
Click to expand...
Why would we hold Putin accountable, I mean why start now?
 
#595
#595
carlos86 said:
New Pentagon Afghanistan report:

“As of February, the Russian government was working with the central government, regional countries, and the Taliban to gain increased influence in Afghanistan, expedite a US military withdrawal, and address security challenges that might arise. Russia has politically supported the Taliban to cultivate influence with the group, limit the Western military presence, and encourage counter ISIS operations, although Russia publicly denies their involvement.”
Click to expand...
This is a shocking development. Shocking!
 
#599
#599
ajvol01 said:
Click to expand...

This intelligence is over a year old. There is nothing to indicate that the Trump Administration even wanted these intelligence reports verified. To the contrary, they were perfectly content to just let the reports sit there and fester. Hence, the reason there were leaks. Judging by today's tweet storm, Trump has long since made up his mind that there is nothing to it. He has even resorted to employing his old stand-by term of "hoax" to describe this intelligence. Trump simply doesn't want to believe it... much less ever do anything about it. But why is Trump so deferential to Putin and Russia? Trump is clearly more concerned with the source of the leaks, than he is concerned with whether or not this intelligence is accurate. And just to be clear - "unverified" does not mean "untrue". How can you describe something which hasn't been verified, as either accurate or inaccurate? Trump shouldn't be using words like "hoax". Such language demonstrates that there is now an agenda in place to discredit these reports, when Trump's only objective should be to arrive at the truth - whatever that may be.

...and the financial data appears strong. At the very least, circumstantial evidence does exist, which indicates that Russia paid the Taliban an awful lot of money. We just need to find out why? What was Russia looking for in return?
 
#600
#600
BowlBrother85 said:
This intelligence is over a year old. There is nothing to indicate that the Trump Administration even wanted these intelligence reports verified. To the contrary, they were perfectly content to just let the reports sit there and fester. Hence, the reason there were leaks. Judging by today's tweet storm, Trump has long since made up his mind that there is nothing to it. He has even resorted to employing his old stand-by term of "hoax" to describe this intelligence. Trump simply doesn't want to believe it... much less ever do anything about it. But why is Trump so deferential to Putin and Russia? Trump is clearly more concerned with the source of the leaks, than he is concerned with whether or not this intelligence is accurate. And just to be clear - "unverified" does not mean "untrue". How can you describe something which hasn't been verified, as either accurate or inaccurate? Trump shouldn't be using words like "hoax". Such language demonstrates that there is now an agenda in place to discredit these reports, when Trump's only objective should be to arrive at the truth - whatever that may be.
Click to expand...
Why are criminal leaks of classified information so widely accepted by the Trump haters?

Why won’t the left / never-Trump crowd publicly denounce criminal leaks?

3-1/2 years of these types of conveniently negative leaks drives mistrust and doubt of the credibility of the information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol and hUTch2002
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top