By whom? Tennessee fans?
Just a reminder: your football team is currently on NCAA probation; mine is not.
The University of Alabama's appeal of vacated football wins hinges largely on how the NCAA applies the repeat violator status of the university, according to a document in the textbook case.
In a Sept. 17 brief as part of the appeal process, Alabama argued the Division I Committee on Infractions (COI) overreached by justifying the vacated wins were due to the
school's history as a "serial repeat violator." The 14-page brief, released today by the school, shows the COI criticized the
university's history of major NCAA violations as "abysmal." The COI criticism, the strongest yet from the NCAA in this case, came in a brief that has not been made public by the NCAA or Alabama.
Alabama was placed on three-year probation in June, fined $43,900 and forced to vacate wins in 21 football games, one postseason tennis match and several individual and team records in track and field. The NCAA reported that 201 athletes in 16 sports obtained textbooks they weren't entitled to under their scholarships.
Alabama's Sept. 17 brief said the COI response claimed the university's repeat violator status was the "driving force" behind vacating records, and justified the penalty because of Alabama's "abysmal infractions track record."
The COI also wrote, according to Alabama's brief, that the university's
"extensive recent history of infractions cases is unmatched by any other member institution in the NCAA" and that what "truly distinguishes this case ... is that the COI faced an institution with an
appalling and unprecedented recent infractions history."
hmmmmmm