Sarah Huckabee-Sanders Asked to Leave Restaurant

He called it a "Muslim ban" himself. He didn't qualify this proposed ban with any other identifiable traits or characteristics aside from religious faith (in Islam). That's bigotry: plain and simple... You are just arguing for the hell of it.

You're putting more emphasis on what it was called than you are on what you said was actually proposed. Which is more important? Myself, I'd put more weight on the actual proposal than any title presented. Ultimately, it's the proposal that matters.
 
Let me reiterate, not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorist are Muslim. Do you agree or disagree with the accuracy of that statement?

Second, did the statement you provided suggest a permanent ban, or did it just call for a delay until we could get our **** together?


Put aside your politics and tell me what's really there, not what it is you're hoping to see.

The left want a new "comprehensive immigration policy". To someone dealing with fact not feelings, that would imply determining what's wrong - even sometimes putting parts on hold when there's obviously a problem - little things like certain groups of people trying to blow up planes and stuff. The truth is that the left version of "comprehensive overhaul" simply means no immigration policy at all.
 
They desperately want her to rebel against Trump and can’t stand the fact she won’t even give them a sound bite.

She won't acknowledge a lie was told... when the administration has been caught in a lie. There are many examples involving numerous people (the timing of the Rob Porter firing, Trump saying he didn't know of the $130K payment to Stormy Daniels in March - he knew as early as January...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Then your side needs to grow up and be more accepting of behavior that you find offensive. It's funny how your side accepts every kind of freak's abbhorent behaviors, but you can't tolerate someone who speaks his mind because it hurts your feelings.

Diversity is very one sided in the liberally diverted mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
She won't acknowledge a lie was told... when the administration has been caught in a lie. There are many examples involving numerous people (the timing of the Rob Porter firing, Trump saying he didn't know of the $130K payment to Stormy Daniels in March - he knew as early as January...)

And it drives you all absolutely nuking futts. It’s freaking glorious! 😂😂😂
 
You're putting more emphasis on what it was called than you are on what you said was actually proposed. Which is more important? Myself, I'd put more weight on the actual proposal than any title presented. Ultimately, it's the proposal that matters.

I get it... You are excusing a bigoted statement because it didn't result in a bigoted course of action. I can't do that.

Personally, I think Trump would like to ban all Muslims from entering the country (even law abiding, well-educated, English speaking ones) but there is that pesky little thing called the Constitution standing in the way...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
That statement checks out fine but it needs to be emphasized that there are currently 1.6 billion Muslims in the world today. That's 23% of the global population. Islam is currently the second largest religion, but it is the fastest growing. Although many countries in the Middle East, North Africa region, where the religion originated in the 7th century, are heavily Muslim, the region is home to only about 20% of the world's Muslims. A majority of the Muslims globally (62%) live in the Asia-Pacific region, including large populations in Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Turkey. These are countries mostly friendly to the United States. You would have a hard time finding immigrants from any country outside the western hemisphere, more well-prepared to assimilate into life in the United States than Indians.

Basically, only a tiny fraction of 1% of Muslims are radicalized. Your statement that not all Muslims are terrorists is an understatement to say the least. Banning Muslims only because of their religious faith is not only bigotry, it doesn't even make any sense. The population is too large and involves too many countries friendly to the United States where there is no threat of terrorism

Then why aren't the 99+% of peaceful fun loving Muslims following the best tradition of handling criminals in their midst and stoning them to death? I guess it's just easier to blame a woman who was raped and stone her maybe. The most fundamentally backwards group in the world - and that's saying a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I get it... You are excusing a bigoted statement because it didn't result in a bigoted course of action. I can't do that.

Personally, I think Trump would like to ban all Muslims from entering the country (even law abiding, well-educated, English speaking ones) but there is that pesky little thing called the Constitution standing in the way...

When you assume things you make an ass out of yourself, not me.
 
She won't acknowledge a lie was told... when the administration has been caught in a lie. There are many examples involving numerous people (the timing of the Rob Porter firing, Trump saying he didn't know of the $130K payment to Stormy Daniels in March - he knew as early as January...)

She's a buffer for the President, there to protect him. It's not her place to admit when he lies. Have past people in her position admitted when the President lied? Did any of Obama's press secretaries call out when he lied? I certainly don't remember it, so I don't understand this expectation she should act differently.
 
I'm all for adding categories for protection. I don't think you should be able to discriminate for stupid reasons, like sexual orientation and politics. Throw it all in there. You guys are usually the ones in favor of letting proprietors decide who they serve and who they don't.
Diversity?
 
You're putting more emphasis on what it was called than you are on what you said was actually proposed. Which is more important? Myself, I'd put more weight on the actual proposal than any title presented. Ultimately, it's the proposal that matters.


The why of it displays the fact that his thinking on the subject is shockingly shallow. He is appealing to the poorly informed base that equates terrorism to Islam. The fact is that terrorism has many genres and is not causally related to one particular religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Imagine if Sanders were black.
Liberals:

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Imagine if she was attractive. That puts more of a strain on the imagination.

That's not really called for. I'm not a fan of Sanders, but she has arguably the toughest job in the administration. I wouldn't want it. I respect her for keeping at it this long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Based on the owner's response, it would seem her restaurant would be severely lacking in customers given how there is little cooperation or honesty in the DC area.

"I explained that the restaurant has certain standards that I feel it has to uphold, such as honesty, and compassion, and cooperation," Wilkinson recalled to The Post of her confrontation with Sanders. "I said, 'I'd like to ask you to leave.'"

And fwiw... your response is just as sad and ridiculous as the owner's comment above. Very sad.

They didn’t want her munching all the hay up. I wouldn’t allow that lurch looking toxic avenger on my property either.
 
Based on the owner's response, it would seem her restaurant would be severely lacking in customers given how there is little cooperation or honesty in the DC area.



And fwiw... your response is just as sad and ridiculous as the owner's comment above. Very sad.
I don’t care about the restaurant’s response. The woman is the mouthpiece for a insecure narcissist. Shame on her. SHAME!
 

VN Store



Back
Top