BigOrangePassion1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 2,007
- Likes
- 0
You're right. Look how consistent Scotty was when it mattered this year in the 'AAs. He almost decided to contest that shot that eliminated us; that's All-American material right there.
It's all relative. Please give us your 3rd team All-America, and it can only include players who didn't make mistakes last year.
Scotty Hopson isn't even the best player at his own position on our team, and he was about the 4th best on the team last year. But if you guys want to keep pretending he's something he's not, have at it.
I'm not pretending anything. You suggest that he's not All-America because he screwed up on a play last year. This is a pre-season all-america team, as in the coming year.
Based on his talent, I don't think it's unreasonable to think he can wind up on the 3rd team All-America after next season. I'm not saying he will, but it's not unreasonable.
Well LawVol I'm sure that Scotty Hopson doesn't give a crap about what you say about him because from this offseason he is working really hard. He did well in the Lebron James Skills camp and right now is currently practicing on the USA Mens Select team.
I don't hate Scotty Hopson nor think he cares what I think about him; however, I, like most rational people, would consider him a disappointment thus far in his career. No one would be happier than me if he was a 3rd Team All-American. I just don't see it.
I suggest that he's not because he has grossly underachieved during his time here and there is absolutely no reason to think he's going to morph into a mentally tough player capable of being an All-American.
That play against Mich. State just illustrates his time at UT, disappointing.
Right. Clearly Dick Vitale's assumption for whatever it's worth, is that Hopson might actually play to his potential. But I agree with you, based on his track record, I don't see it happening. I hope I'm wrong, I think he will be improved, but I don't think he will be All-America.
You're right. Look how consistent Scotty was when it mattered this year in the 'AAs. He almost decided to contest that shot that eliminated us; that's All-American material right there.
If you honestly think that Prince was more dispensable than Hopson, then you ought to just start posting on another forum.
Actually, Brian Williams and JP Prince were contesting the shot (and got called with a foul) that led to the free throw that eliminated us, after Wayne Chism failed to guard his man.
You apparently are confused by the meanings of consistent and perfect.
Nice try. You first try BS with "consistency" and I show that to be silly based on the facts and so you quickly try to Obamatize the English language by misrepresenting what I posted through introduction of the word "dispensable". That's the last resort of someone trying to defend the indefensible.
I'd kinda like to know what this opinion is based on.
Hopson averaged 17.6 points per 40 and Tatum averaged 17.4
And if you put any significance on +/- ratings, Hopson was better over the course of the season. But I think that stat is somewhat circumstantial.
However, Tatum's offensive rating was higher than Hopson's - which measures points per possession each player was used in
BTW - these are stats over the course of the entire season
Actually, Brian Williams and JP Prince were contesting the shot (and got called with a foul) that led to the free throw that eliminated us, after Wayne Chism failed to guard his man.
You apparently are confused by the meanings of consistent and perfect.
It's based on reality. If you look at Cam Tatum's ppg per 40 minutes, I guarantee he averaged more than Hopson the last part of the year.
He's a better defender than Hopson, dribbles through traffic better, creates more turnovers, and is just an all-around tougher player.
Actually, it isn't based on reality. You've invented a category--and estimated it incorrectly, according to golfballs--and used it to justify your bias. Scotty had better numbers. Scotty got more minutes. Scotty is a better player. Michael Hubert, by the way, averaged 46/40 minutes by my quick calculation.