Seantrel Henderson/USC/Violations

#153
#153
DaddyChad said:
No. They meet with them then it will be 6 to 8 weeks from what I've seen before the Infractions Committee decides anything.
Click to expand...

Then this entire thread means nothing.

Henderson is waiting on the NCAA to render a decision before he signs a LOI. If the decision won't be made until after 4/1 then isn't that after the signing deadline?

Isn't there a window the NCAA has set for athletes to sign their LOIs, National Signing Day until ????? I think it is around 3/15.

This is a bunch of :bs:
 
#154
#154
B-HamVOL said:
Then this entire thread means nothing.

Henderson is waiting on the NCAA to render a decision before he signs a LOI. If the decision won't be made until after 4/1 then isn't that after the signing deadline?

Isn't there a window the NCAA has set for athletes to sign their LOIs, National Signing Day until ????? I think it is around 3/15.

This is a bunch of :bs:
Click to expand...
There was an article linked in one of the Henderson threads stating exactly this. Basically he would end up eventually signing with OSU because it would be unlikely that a decision would be reached. USC will at least get a look at what the NCAA has collected though and should have a general idea what could happen based on what the NCAA has found. How forthcoming USC will be with that knowledge with recruits is anyone's guess. Doesn't really matter since he would not be signing with us in any event though.
 
#155
#155
I will tell you what his un signing did - was push USC into the number one slot for recruiting classes which is what CLK wanted - Enough time to boast his class is number one in the country on foxsports, espn, etc. . After this who cares if SH goes somewhere else? CLK got the publicity he wanted and for the next year he can tell every recruit that on national signing day he had the number one class in the nation and it will be the truth.

Life can suck sometimes.
 
#156
#156
Tampavolz said:
I will tell you what his un signing did - was push USC into the number one slot for recruiting classes which is what CLK wanted - Enough time to boast his class is number one in the country on foxsports, espn, etc. . After this who cares if SH goes somewhere else? CLK got the publicity he wanted and for the next year he can tell every recruit that on national signing day he had the number one class in the nation and it will be the truth.

Life can suck sometimes.
Click to expand...

#1 class on rivals


i think scout + espn>>>rivals
 
#158
#158
tvolsfan said:
Strongly disagree.
Click to expand...

you might say quality>>quantity but i think all the extra 3* and 4* guys UF and UT got is better then one more 5*


USC got the highest ranking because they only took 1 guys below 4* which gave them a higher average


but 3* star guys can turn out to be great players
 
Last edited:
#159
#159
I'd rather recruit 20 higher ranked players than 28 lower ranked players. Over 4 years, bringing in 20 players a year will be fine. Obviously not everyone will pan out, but out of 80 very highly ranked recruits, you'll get a damn good team.
 
#161
#161
Any word on this kid, I heard he isn't going to wait until a ruling is handed down, so we may see him chose by 4/1 and his dad said they might just have to trust their gut. I think Kiff will try and sell this kid ocean front property only to find out that it is swamp land.
 
#162
#162
There is not a deadline for him to sign. He dosn't have to sign a LOI at all, on the day freshmen report he can show up to any school that has accepted him and has a scholly available. I would not be suprised at all if this drags out until mid June.
 
#164
#164
BIG BOI 23 said:
well only if you look at rivals is that case

USC isnt any higher then #5 on the other 2 sites
Click to expand...

You don't get it, it doesn't matter which site he is ranked number one on, he can send out the press releases to the fact and it cannot be denied. He got what he wanted and is using it to create excitement about next season and recruiting with the next class. Marketing 101.
 
#168
#168
BIG BOI 23 said:
yes

rivals dropped the ball this year because of their ranking system


like i said usc isnt even top 5 on the other sites
Click to expand...
Who would you rank ahead of USC's class as far as talent? Keep in mind USC couldn't take as many as some other schools because they were already close on the scholarship limit. Saying that a school like Auburn who got some talented players but also a lot of fluff out recruited them would be laughable. Rivals usually does the best job of evaluating and ranking the recruits of any service, Scout doesn't impress me as much, ESPN is just pathetic.
 
#169
#169
rivals ranks based on quality, not quantity. which is how it should be. why should bama et all get credit for taking 10 extra guys they know for sure wont qualify? non sec schools take less players. in the end it matters who is on your actual team.
 
#170
#170
DaddyChad said:
Who would you rank ahead of USC's class as far as talent? Keep in mind USC couldn't take as many as some other schools because they were already close on the scholarship limit. Saying that a school like Auburn who got some talented players but also a lot of fluff out recruited them would be laughable. Rivals usually does the best job of evaluating and ranking the recruits of any service, Scout doesn't impress me as much, ESPN is just pathetic.
Click to expand...
we'll find out how espn is in the future they got way more money to go out and actually watch these kids then anybody else so i dont see how you can say their pathetic


they definitely dont just follow what rivals thinks tho(good thing imo) look at johnathan dowling he's the top saftey on espn and wasnt even in the top 250 on rivals and guess what he got 2 picks in the UA all star game and they still got him at 3*

this is why i say having more 3 and 4* guys shouldnt hurt your score on rivals becuase those guys can turn out to be great players




theres a plenty of other guys that have been rated 3 star by rivals that turn out to be great dexter mcluster comes to mind
 
Last edited:
#171
#171
BIG BOI 23 said:
we'll find out how espn is in the future they got way more money to go out and actually watch these kids then anybody else so i dont see how you can say their pathetic

they definitely dont just follow what rivals thinks tho(good thing imo) look at johnathan dowling he's the top saftey on espn and wasnt even in the top 250 on rivals and guess what he got 2 picks in the UA all star game and they still got him at 3*

this is why i say having more 3 and 4* guys shouldnt hurt your score on rivals becuase those guys can turn out to be great players

theres a plenty of other guys that have been rated 3 star by rivals that turn out to be great dexter mcluster comes to mind
Click to expand...


Because they are pathetic. Anyone who follows recruiting year in and out knows that. Just because the hit on one guy that rivals or scout misses on doesn't mean much when they are off on so many other recruits.

Just looking at the guys USC landed and their class as a whole, I would take Florida's class above them and that is about it. How anyone can say they were not a top five class with a straight face is beyond me.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top