VolFreakJosh
“Don’t you put that evil on me Ricky Bobby!”
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2013
- Messages
- 28,204
- Likes
- 71,922
I am not at all sure about this, but if we ended up being the top 2 seed, wouldn't we be in the same bracket with the weakest 1 seed (Arizona)? Maybe someone knows the answer.A #1 tourney seed is still on the line. Best shot at making our first Final 4 is getting a 1 seed to guarantee we won’t have to beat Houston, UCONN, or Purdue to get there.
Normally, they would put us in the south or east in Houston or UConn’s bracket to give us our closest regional location. But New England and Texas aren’t much better than traveling to California.. so who knows.I am not at all sure about this, but if we ended up being the top 2 seed, wouldn't we being in the same bracket with the weakest 1 seed (Arizona)? Maybe someone knows the answer.
If I were coaching I would try to win the first game and then play my back end of the bench for however long they took us every single year. Unless you are on the bubble that tournament is a complete waste of timeWinning the SEC Regular season makes the SEC Tournament that less important.
Do you think Barnes will rest his starters and give his young guys a chance to play in that kind of environment?
I don’t think we want to risk an injury to one of our key players.
I would, but the selection committee keeps moving the target. When we win the SECT, they don't give it as much weight and say it doesn't matter. We don't win it and they'll use it against us in seeding. I think we've done enough to get the #1 seed right now regardless of the UK game. We lose that game and I think we'd have to at least make the finals to get a #1 seed out west. Honestly, if this team beats UK to finish this gauntlet, I say screw the 1 seed. Rest your starters and roll with the 2 seed as a fresh team.Winning the SEC Regular season makes the SEC Tournament that less important.
Do you think Barnes will rest his starters and give his young guys a chance to play in that kind of environment?
I don’t think we want to risk an injury to one of our key players.
I think if we beat UK it's all over but the shoutin!I would, but the selection committee keeps moving the target. When we win the SECT, they don't give it as much weight and say it doesn't matter. We don't win it and they'll use it against us in seeding. I think we've done enough to get the #1 seed right now regardless of the UK game. We lose that game and I think we'd have to at least make the finals to get a #1 seed out west. Honestly, if this team beats UK to finish this gauntlet, I say screw the 1 seed. Rest your starters and roll with the 2 seed as a fresh team.
Wait a minute do what? Have you ever seen a coach rest the starters in any tournament in sports historyWinning the SEC Regular season makes the SEC Tournament that less important.
Do you think Barnes will rest his starters and give his young guys a chance to play in that kind of environment?
I don’t think we want to risk an injury to one of our key players.
Winning the SEC Regular season makes the SEC Tournament that less important.
Do you think Barnes will rest his starters and give his young guys a chance to play in that kind of environment?
I don’t think we want to risk an injury to one of our key players.
Coaches and players don't think like that. A coach would lose the respect of his team if he or she didn't allow the team to compete for a sec tournament championshipLook, I want to win every game. But if a SEC tournament champ costs us a chance at the National Championship, pass. ZZ worries me about the minutes he's playing. It's going to catch up.
Hope I'm wrong and we don't lose another game this year... may not be the worst thing if we have extra days to rest.
Would it break my heart to won both? Of course not. Just pointing out the other side.