Ernest T. Vol
It's me...Ernest T.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 10,230
- Likes
- 18,128
Go ahead and try that.... or borrow at fixed rates in today's dollars, paying back in tommorrow's. Transfer of wealth to the borrower. Biden may erase everyone's school debt after all.
Your original stance seems flawed.
Have asylum seekers been a large enough population to be a market driver? I get in an absolute sense that even 1 is an impact, but is 80k a year enough to matter? And that's the entire population, looks like Trump got it down to 45k, so a loss of only 35k a year.
Refugees and Asylees in the United States
And that's vs more than a million green cards a year.
Go ahead and try that.
They will likely hyper inflate the dollar and have to devalue the currency to the point where that $5000 in your bank account or in your pocket has some zeroes chopped off and it's only worth $50. But meanwhile, that debt you owed in the old currency will now have to be repaid back
(same nominal principle) in your newly devalued dollars.
The banks will always win.
I've heard far too many people talking about playing that sort of debt game with interest rates being so low and expecting the rules to stay the same whenever the chessboard gets knocked over.I do agree with this part. A giant wealth transfer from the puppet masters won't happen. One of the reasons I don't think the big spending bill gets through.
I've heard far too many people talking about playing that sort of debt game with interest rates being so low and expecting the rules to stay the same whenever the chessboard gets knocked over.
In debt is not where you want to be anytime, but especially right now with so much uncertainty.
If I'm not mistaken (and I'm going off of memory so I could easily be wrong), but I thought the very scenario I'm talking about with debt and devalued currency happened during the Mexican Tequila Crisis in the 1990s.
And you fail both the logical reasoning test and the truthfulness of post test.And you fail the reading comp test. He already made correction after his error and before your post.
And you fail both the logical reasoning test and the truthfulness of post test.
He did not make the correction by editing his post. If one was to read the thread in order, they would come to his uncorrected post before ever seeing the post where he acknowledged his error.
Which has nothing at all to do with reading comprehension. (which is the test you said I failed)I never said he edited his post. I just said he corrected his error. But, you stopped in chronological order at his errored post to dis him on that without first reading on to see that he had admitted his error.
My actual statement "he corrected after his error and before your post."
Does that worker shortage stay constant? Like is that literally because we have more jobs than work force? Or is it people not working?Trump's chamber of commerce told us we were 1 million workers short 2018ish, so 4 years x 35k is over 10% of what the shortage was and I think that makes a difference, yes. It's 6.75% of the current labor shortage, and I think that also makes a difference.
And you mention refugees...70k in 2015 were resettled. Trump got it down to 15k.
Plus all the other forms of restriction...
Does that worker shortage stay constant? Like is that literally because we have more jobs than work force? Or is it people not working?
Either is a shortage, but only one "has" to be solved with an outside workforce. Especially strange if you are counting on asylum seekers as a constant enough workforce to make up some difference.
That's not the way that works. Your $5,000 liability is still $5,000. After a massive devaluation, you still repay the same $5,000. In your example, it's just that the $5,000 is now only worth $50 in today's dollars. The issue with hyperinflation is that now it costs $100 to buy a bag of 5 apples. No bueno.Go ahead and try that.
They will likely hyper inflate the dollar and have to devalue the currency to the point where that $5000 in your bank account or in your pocket has some zeroes chopped off and it's only worth $50. But meanwhile, that debt you owed in the old currency will now have to be repaid back
(same nominal principle) in your newly devalued dollars.
The banks will always win.
The issue in many countries, such as Argentina, is that they cancel their current currency and issue a new currency that is largely worthless.I've heard far too many people talking about playing that sort of debt game with interest rates being so low and expecting the rules to stay the same whenever the chessboard gets knocked over.
In debt is not where you want to be anytime, but especially right now with so much uncertainty.
If I'm not mistaken (and I'm going off of memory so I could easily be wrong), but I thought the very scenario I'm talking about with debt and devalued currency happened during the Mexican Tequila Crisis in the 1990s.
There has been a chicken wing shortage in this country since this past February. The local meat market that I normally buy my wings from hasn't had a steady supply since the Super Bowl. It has slightly improved over the last few weeks, but between March and July/August, it was hit or miss going in that place.