Should Alex Jones be allowed back on Twitter?

Should Alex Jones be allowed back on Twitter?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
#1

Electric Orange

๐“œ๐“ช๐“ด๐“ฎ ๐“๐“ถ๐“ฎ๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ฌ๐“ช ๐“ก๐“ธ๐“ฌ๐“ด ๐“๐“ฐ๐“ช๐“ฒ๐“ท
Joined
Apr 28, 2010
Messages
21,080
Likes
76,231
#1
Just askin...
 
#2
#5
#8
#8
#9
#9
#11
#11
Talk about a false headline. The AP admitted nothing. They talked to an attorney who said that.

It's Elon's call if he wants Alex back on Twitter. It's his company....
Right, so they have to say, "We the AP officially admit,"
 
#12
#12
Talk about a false headline. The AP admitted nothing. They talked to an attorney who said that.

It's Elon's call if he wants Alex back on Twitter. It's his company....
Who said otherwise?
 
#13
#13
Right, so they have to say, "We the AP officially admit,"

You are a brain dead right winger if you think that printing an attorney's opinion is them admitting something.

I'm a CPA. If the AP asked me about Trump's taxes and I said "Trump is a tax cheat" that wouldn't be the AP admitting that Trump is a tax cheat....
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClearwaterVol
#15
#15
You are a brain dead right winger if you think that printing an attorney's opinion is them admitting something.

I'm a CPA. If the AP asked me about Trump's taxes and I said "Trump is a tax cheat" that wouldn't be the AP admitting that Trump is a tax cheat....
Maybe you're just bad at inferences...
 
#18
#18
Maybe you shouldn't be trusting a guy that lies about kids being massacred....

Enjoy those dietary supplements before the globalists come for you....
It's not that I trust him, I trust his 1st Amendment right to speak.
 
#20
#20
Twitter isn't the government.

But if we don't allow him back who will warn of the intedimensional demonic pedophiles and and crisis actors posing as dead kids?
Considering what has come out about the government agencies being involved in Twitter, it was absolutely a front for the government. Our government violated peopleโ€™s 1st amendment rights regarding twitter. Itโ€™s a big deal.
 
#21
#21
I mean, of course he should be allowed back on. And I will continue to utterly ignore him, the same as I have ever done.

The point about free speech, is that you only know it exists once you allow it for people whose views you find idiotic or abhorrent. Everyone likes to think only their side has common sense.

If he advocates for an actual crime, that is different. If he says go bomb someone's house or posts kiddie porn, etc burn him and ban him. But just because his views are stupid, crazy or even "dangerous!", he should have the same rights as everyone else to espouse them publicly.

If Twitter wants to be truly "neutral" then it cant deplatform people just because they dont agree with them.
 
#22
#22
Considering what has come out about the government agencies being involved in Twitter, it was absolutely a front for the government. Our government violated peopleโ€™s 1st amendment rights regarding twitter. Itโ€™s a big deal.
Elon isn't the government. He's free to allow or ban anyone he wants.

Same rules apply here. Freak can ban anyone he wants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
#24
#24
Elon isn't the government. He's free to allow or ban anyone he wants.

Same rules apply here. Freak can ban anyone he wants.


I agree.

Which is why the hysteria from Fox and others that the prior ownership of Twitter did something wrong is so hypocritical.
 
#25
#25
Yeah, thatโ€™s not what happened.
The question is should Alex Jones be allowed on Twitter (today, no time travel involved)

Twitter is a private company currently owned by Elon Musk. The first amendment applies to government censure. Elon is not the government.

Elon can ban anyone and has already banned the kid that tracks his plane.
 

VN Store



Back
Top