bpalmer28
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 12,183
- Likes
- 19,835
If Hooker being out played a role in the rankings, should we have downplayed the injury and not given any specifics until after final CFP rankings? Could have just said “it’s a knee injury. We hope to get him back for post-season”. And left it at that.
If Hooker being out played a role in the rankings, should we have downplayed the injury and not given any specifics until after final CFP rankings? Could have just said “it’s a knee injury. We hope to get him back for post-season”. And left it at that.
If Hooker being out played a role in the rankings, should we have downplayed the injury and not given any specifics until after final CFP rankings? Could have just said “it’s a knee injury. We hope to get him back for post-season”. And left it at that.
The biggest factor isn't the Hooker injury, it's losing to a team we should've beaten into chicken nuggets and giving up 63 points to an offense rated well out of the top 25.I agree. But I think that is the kind of action being encouraged by the using the injury as an excuse for the unjust ranking.
I'm totally against the coach bowing to some kind of player revolt. Totally. Coach Heupel needs control of the team, not the players.Should've pulled him when it was obvious that the quick game wasn't working and that there was some type of issue between him and whomever on the defense.. hell.. they may have done it because they wanted Milton to get playing time.. who knows.. but the Vandy running game was what we could've/should've went with instead of sticking to what wasn't working.. Hooker would still be well.. we'd be ranked #3 and everything would be great.
Should've pulled him when it was obvious that the quick game wasn't working and that there was some type of issue between him and whomever on the defense.. hell.. they may have done it because they wanted Milton to get playing time.. who knows.. but the Vandy running game was what we could've/should've went with instead of sticking to what wasn't working.. Hooker would still be well.. we'd be ranked #3 and everything would be great.
We ran the ball well in the first drive. Slowing the game down by running helps the defense by keeping them off the field and lets the opposing offense sit around and possibly lose their drive as well. We became predictable and desperate. We threw on 1st down for incompletions. We kept doing it over and over, so they knew it was coming. Even if we had scored quickly, it would put our defense right back out there facing their hot offense.I'm totally against the coach bowing to some kind of player revolt. Totally. Coach Heupel needs control of the team, not the players.
And blaming it on our not using the running game is absurd. We gave up 63 points and they scored on what.... 9 of 10 possessions? That's not a "we didn't use the running game" problem.
If Hooker being out played a role in the rankings, should we have downplayed the injury and not given any specifics until after final CFP rankings? Could have just said “it’s a knee injury. We hope to get him back for post-season”. And left it at that.
The committee has given several conflicting reasons for ranking Alabama above us, none of which includes the criteria they announced in their first ranking. They didn't do it because of any logical reasons, they did it because they wanted Alabama ranked higher, and they're making up reasons on the fly to justify it.If Hooker being out played a role in the rankings, should we have downplayed the injury and not given any specifics until after final CFP rankings? Could have just said “it’s a knee injury. We hope to get him back for post-season”. And left it at that.