Standards aren't what they used to be. Never understand why Romo replaced Phil Sims. Here is an assessment. Obvious there are others.
AI Overview
Learn more
While it's impossible to know definitively who thinks Tony Romo is a bad broadcaster, a significant portion of fans and some commentators have criticized his analysis and commentary, citing his tendency to talk too much, make inaccurate calls, and deliver biased opinions.
Here's a more detailed look at the criticisms:
- Overly Talkative and Opinionated:
Many viewers find Romo's commentary excessive, with him often talking over plays and offering opinions that are unrelated to the game.
- Inaccurate Analysis:
Some argue that Romo's analysis is often wrong, with him needing to be corrected by his co-hosts.
- Bias:
Some viewers have accused Romo of showing bias towards certain teams or players, particularly against teams like the Buffalo Bills.
- Lack of Insight:
Some argue that Romo's commentary lacks genuine insight into the game, with his analysis being more about his own opinions than actual football knowledge.
- Overly Excited and Dramatic:
Some find Romo's on-air personality to be overly excited and dramatic, which detracts from the broadcast.
- CBS Almost Had an Intervention:
There have been reports that CBS almost had an intervention with Romo over his poor NFL analysis.