SIAA- Mike Keith’s Color Man?

#56
#56
He's making nearly 20 million a year to call football games, I'd say you're in the minority. It's not a matter of intelligence.

Just because you make 20 million doesn't mean you are all that. "Connections". Phil Sims was so much better. And you are right. It's obviously not a matter of intelligence. Romo is everything but that. And I'm not in the minority, I will present you with poll results once finalized.
 
#57
#57
He routinely ranks at the top of fan polls as the best, so I think it’s more your group of friends that doesn’t like him. To each his own.
Standards aren't what they used to be. Never understand why Romo replaced Phil Sims. Here is an assessment. Obvious there are others.
AI Overview
Learn more

While it's impossible to know definitively who thinks Tony Romo is a bad broadcaster, a significant portion of fans and some commentators have criticized his analysis and commentary, citing his tendency to talk too much, make inaccurate calls, and deliver biased opinions.

Here's a more detailed look at the criticisms:
  • Overly Talkative and Opinionated:
    Many viewers find Romo's commentary excessive, with him often talking over plays and offering opinions that are unrelated to the game.

  • Inaccurate Analysis:
    Some argue that Romo's analysis is often wrong, with him needing to be corrected by his co-hosts.

  • Bias:
    Some viewers have accused Romo of showing bias towards certain teams or players, particularly against teams like the Buffalo Bills.

  • Lack of Insight:
    Some argue that Romo's commentary lacks genuine insight into the game, with his analysis being more about his own opinions than actual football knowledge.

  • Overly Excited and Dramatic:
    Some find Romo's on-air personality to be overly excited and dramatic, which detracts from the broadcast.

  • CBS Almost Had an Intervention:
    There have been reports that CBS almost had an intervention with Romo over his poor NFL analysis.
 
#58
#58
Can't believe this name hasn't been mentioned yet, Phil Fulmer. Not that I'm pushing for that but I figured some of his disciples would have floated his name by now.

And I wonder if they will add a female sideline reporter also
Fulmer has a vocabulary of about 50 words and couldn't say s#¥t if he had a mouthful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brockytop
#59
#59
I know a guy in the administration that’s a reliable source. He said they have their guy. It’s a lock. Apparently this guy has land in east TN and his wife is a former cheerleader…….
Oh, wow, it's Peyton!
 
#60
#60
Charles Davis would be my choice. But doubt he leaves what he’s doing.
He's good enough to be the main man. Too good for second fiddle in any broadcast booth.
Mike Keith was my #1 pick, but Charles Davis is just as good.

Travis Henry for football and Ramar Smith for basketball per my sources…
I actually imagined this broadcast and it was can't miss radio.

Can't believe this name hasn't been mentioned yet, Phil Fulmer. Not that I'm pushing for that but I figured some of his disciples would have floated his name by now.

And I wonder if they will add a female sideline reporter also
How would broadcasted clapping after an opponent's TD work?
"Now it's time for our inappropriate clapping segment. Take it Phil."
 
  • Like
Reactions: OllVol and 1morevol
#63
#63
Charles Davis would be my choice. But doubt he leaves what he’s doing.

I had several classes with Charles Davis back in the day and unequivocally say he’s a first class individual and a true VFL. That said, he’s a third rate broadcaster and nothing will change that.

Davis fits right in to a broadcaster that loves hearing himself whether he has anything meaningful to say or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillisWG
#67
#67
I haven't seen this mentioned, and maybe it's not a possibility, but John Ward always called basketball games solo. And he was magnificent. I would like to see Keith go solo.

It's not like football where you need a spotter to mark the ball. I thought Ward going solo in basketball gave him a better flow and control of the call. No one to interrupt him. Kesling could never pull this off, but the great ones like Ward (and Cawood Ledford, as another example) could make it work. I think Keith could too.
Ward was really excellent at BB. If you listened closely you could almost see the game and you might get some insight you would otherwise overlook.
 
#68
#68
Ward was really excellent at BB. If you listened closely you could almost see the game and you might get some insight you would otherwise overlook.
He was the best. Better at basketball than football. But I think basketball as a sport lends itself to showcasing a great announcer more.
 
#69
#69
Wouldn't this be sweet? Probably need to go blue font, because it'll never happen, but dang, can you just IMAGINE the explanations of each play, before and after the snap? Not to mention the sarcastic wit and inside stories of his life of football. I'll lay awake dreaming of this scenario until I hear different.

View attachment 728609

Edit: Having a super bowl winner as a color commentator has already happened for the Vols. Bill Anderson, John Ward's sidekick played in Super Bowl 1 for the Green Bay Packers. Also on that Super Bowl 1 team was Bill Curry who coached for Alabama and Kentucky.
Dream scenario here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ptcarter
#71
#71
I haven't seen this mentioned, and maybe it's not a possibility, but John Ward always called basketball games solo. And he was magnificent. I would like to see Keith go solo.

It's not like football where you need a spotter to mark the ball. I thought Ward going solo in basketball gave him a better flow and control of the call. No one to interrupt him. Kesling could never pull this off, but the great ones like Ward (and Cawood Ledford, as another example) could make it work. I think Keith could too.
Ralph Hacker was Cawood's color guy. He didn't fly solo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NighthawkVol

VN Store



Back
Top