SJW Culture, Pride Parades, Tolerance and such

Seriously
Dudes can't even talk about juggs anymore.

Remember the workplace rules against sexual harassment - basically it came down to keep your mouth shut, hands off, and thoughts to yourself. That seemed to expand from the workplace to public, and it was a de facto norm until the dems started pandering to their diversities. So now it seems that some can flaunt what they want ... except for normal people - and especially white males. There's not much you can say against having good manners and good taste in your actions when not in private; there's even less you can say about behavior that is acceptable for some but not for all. What is objectionable to many of us is that this crap is being done in public and in front of unwilling "participants" and viewers. It seems some people would limit actions of others but feel entitled to publicly do whatever they choose - not hold themselves to the standards they deem correct.
 
Remember the workplace rules against sexual harassment - basically it came down to keep your mouth shut, hands off, and thoughts to yourself. That seemed to expand from the workplace to public, and it was a de facto norm until the dems started pandering to their diversities. So now it seems that some can flaunt what they want ... except for normal people - and especially white males. There's not much you can say against having good manners and good taste in your actions when not in private; there's even less you can say about behavior that is acceptable for some but not for all. What is objectionable to many of us is that this crap is being done in public and in front of unwilling "participants" and viewers. It seems some people would limit actions of others but feel entitled to publicly do whatever they choose - not hold themselves to the standards they deem correct.


22 years of diligent work with the company erased with one joke. Joke was on spot too.
 
Remember the workplace rules against sexual harassment - basically it came down to keep your mouth shut, hands off, and thoughts to yourself. That seemed to expand from the workplace to public, and it was a de facto norm until the dems started pandering to their diversities. So now it seems that some can flaunt what they want ... except for normal people - and especially white males. There's not much you can say against having good manners and good taste in your actions when not in private; there's even less you can say about behavior that is acceptable for some but not for all. What is objectionable to many of us is that this crap is being done in public and in front of unwilling "participants" and viewers. It seems some people would limit actions of others but feel entitled to publicly do whatever they choose - not hold themselves to the standards they deem correct.

The funny thing is social media is full of millions of hoochies, especially young women, wanting to show their goodies and be objectified for some attention and a dollar.
 
The funny thing is social media is full of millions of hoochies, especially young women, wanting to show their goodies and be objectified for some attention and a dollar.
The not funny thing is hideous dudes trying to pass as women waving their junk in kids' faces and being praised for it.

Progress.
 
Remember the workplace rules against sexual harassment - basically it came down to keep your mouth shut, hands off, and thoughts to yourself. That seemed to expand from the workplace to public, and it was a de facto norm until the dems started pandering to their diversities. So now it seems that some can flaunt what they want ... except for normal people - and especially white males. There's not much you can say against having good manners and good taste in your actions when not in private; there's even less you can say about behavior that is acceptable for some but not for all. What is objectionable to many of us is that this crap is being done in public and in front of unwilling "participants" and viewers. It seems some people would limit actions of others but feel entitled to publicly do whatever they choose - not hold themselves to the standards they deem correct.
What he said most certainly isn't workplace harassment. So apparently he offended some fellow workers by what he did and said in his free time. Well I don't like what Sam Brinton does in his free time. Why isn't he fired for cross dressing and being a drag queen?
 
What he said most certainly isn't workplace harassment. So apparently he offended some fellow workers by what he did and said in his free time. Well I don't like what Sam Brinton does in his free time. Why isn't he fired for cross dressing and being a drag queen?

White heterosexual males aren’t allowed the same rules when enjoying art. This guy fired for repeating a line from a movie, the HS kid getting his scholarship offer rescinded from UF for singing a song.
 
It's ugly, I get it but he's retired so there's not much we can do about it. Whatever. There's some real screwed up folks out there
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Liberals don't believe in free speech for others. They do believe in the right to press any issue they want and in the right to be so aggressive in defending their position that they "shame" or defame others who disagree. Weak people surrender to the onslaught and become as much a problem as the originators.

Your last sentence, we are there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and AM64
Your last sentence, we are there.

Yep. I was really disturbed by this statement. It's unacceptable - basically an authority figure abusing his position to deny someone the Constitutional right to dissent and to free speech. I'd bet the guy won't be punished in any way for it either. If the military should act against him, it won't be because they disagree with the colonel's statement or his abuse of position; it will be because he embarrassed the military. Just another case of the military "losing confidence" in someone.

Reading's post even prompted a response from the U.S. military. Lt. Col. Christopher Schilling of Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst flagged the mom to local police for exhibiting what he described as "safety concerns."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
The baker didn't want to provide a service outside his normal scope of activity. The restauranteur did not want to provide his normal scope of activity. There's a difference.
The Baker owned his shop and made the decision. The restaurateur bowed to the complaints of his employees. Should he have fired them all? What was the right thing to do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top