0nelilreb
Don’t ask if you don’t want the truth .
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 28,368
- Likes
- 45,486
I figured you’d be all for that . You never watched the movie “ Mars Attacks” ?
View attachment 207202
So I've seen different sides of this on several sites. Some think it's a worthy goal, others think it's a waste of money that could be better spent on more earthly projects.
How does VN feel about the budgets for NASA as well as the goals in our space programs?
ETA: NASA budget typically runs $17-18 Billion and change.
Budget of NASA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Truth be told, we've had a space force since the 60's and have been trading with different civilizations for many years....TRUTH!
Wake Up America and smell the roses
When you are hanging out on reddit, check out r/space, r/spacex, r/SpaceLaunchSystem, and r/Futurology. Good ways to get info on space exploration stuff, plus some hard core sci fi type proposals on futurology if you are a nerd like me. There isn't really any R v D debate, that usually gets buried in the thread. There is constant arguing between SpaceX and NASA dudes, but it is much more tame and friendly than a VolNation argument.Thanks for keeping this thread up to date fellas. Always very interested, and refuse to watch MSM news, so i learn everything online and from very few sources. This one is my space source, along with reddit updates where they show video of all the launches etc...reddit/ conservative has good stuff too. Much of what we share and discuss here is there.
Hog i believe made a very good point the other day about IMO2020...almost nobody has that on their radar..if we are still in tarriff wars, trump better order a delay on that or we will go in a recession IMO...too much drag for anyones economy to overcome.
18 new Earth-size exoplanets pop up in old Kepler planet-hunting data
Oh well >>> nothing we can do but look and enjoy this new discovery of 18 planets.
Right now some of the probes, Webb telescope, strike me as more bang for the buck than sending a human to the moon, or even Mars.
Right now some of the probes, Webb telescope, strike me as more bang for the buck than sending a human to the moon, or even Mars.
I couldn't agree more. If they go forward with a manned Mars mission I'm betting you're going to see a project go more over budged and further behind schedule than any project of any kind in history.
I couldn't agree more. If they go forward with a manned Mars mission I'm betting you're going to see a project go more over budged and further behind schedule than any project of any kind in history.
I think there are benefits in both approaches to space exploration. Unmanned probes and scientific instruments doing the jobs we can't do yet (Juno and the JWST are two examples off the top of my head) while also keeping alive the path of manned exploration of bodies we can and should be using as stepping stones to fulfill a destiny of becoming a multi-planet species. That's the ultimate goal and path we should be taking. The moon is a good "proving ground" for technologies we can and should be developing for long term sustainment of humans in space. Sure, we've been there, done that, but we haven't proven we can support it for long periods outside of low earth orbit.
Let's face facts here, we're long overdue for another big hit which will happen eventually. Just in the last 100 years or so we've had serious enough impact events as well as studies of past events to give the wake up call that life is fragile on our planet and deflection strategies can and should include a long term manned mission to deflect incoming threats. Shoemaker-Levy 9 is a prime example of the disruption even a relatively small body could have on our planet and we do not have the tidal forces capable of tearing it apart like Jupiter did. Sustained manned exploration and colonization of the moon and other bodies in the solar system should be in the plans sooner rather than later.
The approach they took in the 60s, using both manned and unmanned exploration missions as a platform for a later lunar landing, is a good model. Apollo wouldn't have been able to reach the moon if not for the Ranger and Surveyor probes. A good blend of both should be in the cards rather than playing politics and changing paths every four to eight years as Administrations change.
I think the space exploration that is made public is very minuscule, compared to the Black Unacknowledged space projects that are top secret and need To know only.
There is so much that the public is not privy to when it comes to the space program and even some Presidents are not even read in on such top secret information..... think about that for a moment, if you will
I think the space exploration that is made public is very minuscule, compared to the Black Unacknowledged space projects that are top secret and need To know only.
There is so much that the public is not privy to when it comes to the space program and even some Presidents are not even read in on such top secret information..... think about that for a moment, if you will
Dude, seriously don't care about these super secret projects you claim to exist. There are other threads designed to the tin foil theories.
Just in the last 100 years or so we've had serious enough impact events as well as studies of past events to give the wake up call that life is fragile on our planet and deflection strategies can and should include a long term manned mission to deflect incoming threats.