VolsDeep
5 star poster
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,465
- Likes
- 0
Moral victories are still losses
But how good a coach is rests on more than winning %, especially if your at a place like vanderbilt.... Maybe I'm beating a dead horse, but my argument rests on two premises:
1) the SEC is a much more well-balanced conference with legitimately 4-5 teams that could win a national championship every year. This type of balance is a modern notion ( I know some of you will feel the need to try and correct me by spouting off how much you know about the SEC in the 80's or even further, but lets not forget KY beat LSU last year and miss. state beat auburn).
2) B/c of this, it is unfair to say that a current coach in the SEC (esp. at a school like vanderbilt) is no better than past coaches b/c his winnign % is the same, esp. if he is playing better teams than they were. Yes, Vandy choked at the end of last season, etc., but Vandy is no longer a laughing stock in the SEC - and since they have MUCH higher academic standards than the rest of the SEC, and since they have the least strongest fan-base, he deserves to be mentioned as one of the best coaches in the SEC...