NeverWe'llSever
NashVol
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2016
- Messages
- 5,600
- Likes
- 12,990
Do they? At specific positions, yes. But they’re not everything. Where they’re most important is Quarterback, offensive line (primarily tackles) and pass rushers. You can also make a solid case for linebackers but there’s a drop off from linebackers to the other 3.
With DBs, WRs and RBs there’s a boatload of guys in the 3️ range that turn into great or elite players. Not saying the 5 star WR/DBs don’t turn out elite but it’s far more common for 3-Star skill guys to develop into elite talents than it is any other position.
When Clemson won their 2 national titles, the roster wasn’t exactly loaded with a ton of 5 star kids. What they did have was a 5 star QB both times and studs on both sides of the line of scrimmage.. especially the defensive line. The average recruiting class ranking of the national title team in 2016 was like 11. In 2018 it was 7 or 8.
If you consistently recruit top 10, you have enough talent to win a national title if your coach is really good. We’re on the way to doing so. You don’t HAVE to have the number 1 class every year to compete. Does it help? Yes. But if you have half a roster of 5 stars and can’t win big, it shows the coaching staff isn’t very good at anything except recruiting.
You don’t need number 1 classes. It definitely helps, but there’s so many other factors that stars can’t measure. They can’t measure attitude, they can’t measure scheme fit/role in a program, they can’t measure work ethic, they can’t measure how much somebody wants to be great. And also, fact is, a lot of players are late bloomers, physically and in skill and experience. I mean, even personally, when I was a senior in high school, I was 5’11, 140 pounds. I was a bean pole. When I was a senior in college, I was 6’0, 190 pounds. Most boys become men in college and it’s the same deal for athletes.