Mikevol1964
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Messages
- 297
- Likes
- 954
what about players getting the chance for NIL payments is totally against the college experience? its people like you who have made this mess and stand in the way of it getting fixed.Outlaw NIL from recruiting and you solve this problem. NIL was not conceived to be used a recruiting tool--but owing to vague
language and rules the major programs have corrupted it and turned it effectively into a bribery contest for prospects. In doing so
they've turned top high-school prospects into money-grubbing mercenaries. I'm pretty sure that's not what college is supposed to be about--
even if the fans--most have whom have not been to college--are fixated on winning games as opposed to the totality of the college experience.
Certainly, all D1 programs below the major-college level should support a ban on NIL for recruiting purposes as it now simply benefits major programs with the most rich booster crazies. It's time to TRY and restore a scintilla of integrity to college football before it goes completely down the ethical toilet. It's about three-quarters of the way down the hole now.
Good luck with that.Outlaw NIL from recruiting and you solve this problem. NIL was not conceived to be used a recruiting tool--but owing to vague
language and rules the major programs have corrupted it and turned it effectively into a bribery contest for prospects. In doing so
they've turned top high-school prospects into money-grubbing mercenaries. I'm pretty sure that's not what college is supposed to be about--
even if the fans--most have whom have not been to college--are fixated on winning games as opposed to the totality of the college experience.
Certainly, all D1 programs below the major-college level should support a ban on NIL for recruiting purposes as it now simply benefits major programs with the most rich booster crazies. It's time to TRY and restore a scintilla of integrity to college football before it goes completely down the ethical toilet. It's about three-quarters of the way down the hole now.
Who is going to outlaw it from recruiting? You are aware Bama has been paying kids for years before the NIL right? Damn you rattle on with the same BS in every thread.Outlaw NIL from recruiting and you solve this problem. NIL was not conceived to be used a recruiting tool--but owing to vague
language and rules the major programs have corrupted it and turned it effectively into a bribery contest for prospects. In doing so
they've turned top high-school prospects into money-grubbing mercenaries. I'm pretty sure that's not what college is supposed to be about--
even if the fans--most have whom have not been to college--are fixated on winning games as opposed to the totality of the college experience.
Certainly, all D1 programs below the major-college level should support a ban on NIL for recruiting purposes as it now simply benefits major programs with the most rich booster crazies. It's time to TRY and restore a scintilla of integrity to college football before it goes completely down the ethical toilet. It's about three-quarters of the way down the hole now.
The NCAA banned college kids participating in their programs from holding jobs. Almost every college kid I knew (or at least spent time with, friends) had a job. It's a normal thing.what about players getting the chance for NIL payments is totally against the college experience? its people like you who have made this mess and stand in the way of it getting fixed.
This is exactly what college is about. high schoolers choosing a place to go to that will maximize their earning potential as they see fit. Students have always been able to leave and go to other colleges, chasing scholarships, grants, endowments, payments, employment and many other forms of financial support.
how is this an issue of ethics at all? what is morally or ethically wrong about seeking payment for your worth? you and the NCAA are the ones being completely unethical, denying student's their rights, as evidenced by the 9-0 Supreme Court ruling.
Why make the point about the fans? “Most of whom have not been to college.” What does that have to do with this discussion. Since when did we start differentiating between alumni and non-alumni as being qualified to be fans? Neither of my parents went to UT - hell they didn’t even go to college. But they taught me to be VFL and made sure I went to UT. Don’t look down your nose at fans that didn’t go to college fella. Go talk sH*t like this on another board.Outlaw NIL from recruiting and you solve this problem. NIL was not conceived to be used a recruiting tool--but owing to vague
language and rules the major programs have corrupted it and turned it effectively into a bribery contest for prospects. In doing so
they've turned top high-school prospects into money-grubbing mercenaries. I'm pretty sure that's not what college is supposed to be about--
even if the fans--most have whom have not been to college--are fixated on winning games as opposed to the totality of the college experience.
Certainly, all D1 programs below the major-college level should support a ban on NIL for recruiting purposes as it now simply benefits major programs with the most rich booster crazies. It's time to TRY and restore a scintilla of integrity to college football before it goes completely down the ethical toilet. It's about three-quarters of the way down the hole now.
NOW there is a level playing field. Before NIL, Bama could buy any player with Saban protected by SEC office.If NIL is unfairly going to benefit the traditional major programs, why have 2 teams that never before the past couple seasons ever sniffed the CFP made it in to the top 4 teams at the end of the regular season?
TCU and Washington are not traditional major football programs but made it to the CFP in the NIL era.