Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,842
So is it like Rogue A is selling to Rogue B at a loss? And then Rogue B sells back to Rogue A at a loss? And they just continue to swap paper between the two of them to help drive down the price?I don't think Citadel is in on it because they're forcing Robinhood to cancel buy orders from their customers. The point about who actually owns most of the shares could be explained by large mutual funds that have millions of investors and don't really day trade. The large mutual funds aren't the problem with today's stock market anyway. It's not even wealthy people that invest in good companies. The problem is the high frequency traders, these hedge funds, and private equity firms that skim, manipulate, and destroy decent companies just to make a profit.
The fact that retail is being forced out of the buy side, while big finance tries to wrangle its way out of this is horrific. It seems like we're seeing massive scale financial manipulation minute by minute. The stock was dropping like a rock on almost no volume earlier (because the redditors aren't selling). It was possibly a couple of firms trading the same stocks lower hoping to trigger any automatic stop loss levels.
The timing and rate of change is the only difference in the two situations. The point is that you still have a situation where a stock is being pumped up artificially. If anything, the slower rate of change in Tesla and other stocks should have bought the regulators and the brokers more time to evaluate and address the situation before they went to ridiculous market caps. This is clearly a situation where the Big Guys are caught with their pants down and this isn't working in their favor.Tesla was not even close to as extreme. The details were there in OP. Was Peloton 2000% in a month?
The timing and rate of change is the only difference in the two situations. The point is that you still have a situation where a stock is being pumped up artificially. If anything, the slower rate of change in Tesla and other stocks should have bought the regulators and the brokers more time to evaluate and address the situation before they went to ridiculous market caps. This is clearly a situation where the Big Guys are caught with their pants down and this isn't working in their favor.
So is it like Rogue A is selling to Rogue B at a loss? And then Rogue B sells back to Rogue A at a loss? And they just continue to swap paper between the two of them to help drive down the price?
The timing and rate of change is the only difference in the two situations. The point is that you still have a situation where a stock is being pumped up artificially. If anything, the slower rate of change in Tesla and other stocks should have bought the regulators and the brokers more time to evaluate and address the situation before they went to ridiculous market caps. This is clearly a situation where the Big Guys are caught with their pants down and this isn't working in their favor.
Well, the same situation that I have been pounding the table on in the gold and silver markets are present here. ~150% more shorts than there are GME stock outstanding. SLV and GLD have far more paper contracts than they do metal on reserve. Naked shorting plain and simple, yet no one goes to jail.I believe they're more similar than different. Tesla skyrocketed because of a short squeeze; they're calling GameStop a gamma squeeze because there are so many short positions compared to available stock.
Well, the same situation that I have been pounding the table on in the gold and silver markets are present here. ~150% more shorts than there are GME stock outstanding. SLV and GLD have far more paper contracts than they do metal on reserve. Naked shorting plain and simple, yet no one goes to jail.
Oh, I wasn't suggesting that the redditors should move into SLV, although, even in the SLV prospectus, it says they can just settle with cash.Somehow rehypothecation plays a role as well. I don't think you can get the same scenario in the precious metals market unless all the redditors demanded physical delivery. Just my opinion... would LOVE to see it though,.
So wait the SEC or whoever, is going after Robinhood because their users didnt participate in the short sell? Trying to claim it was some type of illegal conspiracy/price fixing? Even though it sounds like they just did the exact same thing the hedge fund was doing. But in opposite.