norrislakevol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2007
- Messages
- 7,749
- Likes
- 13,460
So if the .gov is going to insure all deposits, why will banks continue to fund the FDIC?U.S. government guarantees all Silicon Valley Bank deposits, money available Monday
Except the money isn’t available.
Kevin O’Leary on Fox Business just now. He’s not a fan of the government’s response and wanted instead to sit back and let it unfold. He claimed that 95% of the assets are recoverable (no idea if that’s a valid claim or not) thus there was zero basis for the government to make the extraordinary statement that all deposits would be guaranteed. He trashed the large money depositors for not doing their own risk management on bank deposits also. He ends with the bank is gone, nobody is going to buy SVD any brand it had is toxic, and it’s just down to liquidation.
I don’t know about years but it will take time I agree. If the regulators piece meal the assets out it’s a buying opportunity for banks that actually managed their risk. They still bear interest and as the interest rates eventually go back down the bond valuations will absolutely rise.Technically, he is right about the deposits still being there and becoming available. It will be years before you see it
I don’t know about years but it will take time I agree. If the regulators piece meal the assets out it’s a buying opportunity for banks that actually managed their risk. They still bear interest and as the interest rates eventually go back down the bond valuations will absolutely rise.
Ok, understood. I’m guessing servicing of any loans made by SVB will move to a new servicer as I believe the regulators arr moving forward with liquidation, the funds of those sales would go back to depositors then.I’m saying if your loans paid back on schedule it would be years, which is where a large portion your deposits are sitting.
Considering that the Zuckerburg twit just announced another 10,000 person layoff, I doubt anyone in the country is interested in taking on any spoiled children company debt in San Francisco right now, unless they get it for a few cents on the dollar.Charlie Gasparino on Fox Business just now says he has sources inside SVB whom have looked at their portfolio and says it isn’t really your typical government backed bonds portfolio. Has a lot of venture capital leveraged business loans. Instruments that are hard to value. Doesn’t think there will be any serious interests from anyone who could buy the whole book like JP Morgan. That conflicts with O’Leary’s take earlier so who knows.
Considering that the Zuckerburg twit just announced another 10,000 person layoff, I doubt anyone in the country is interested in taking on any spoiled children company debt in San Francisco right now, unless they get it for a few cents on the dollar.
You didn't actually expect that the federal government would allow SVB account holders to lose money, did you? Silicon Valley = Liberals = Democrats = 100% Federal Government backing.It is not the regulators or feds job to make you enact wise concentrations on your balance sheet within your asset block. What freaking moron thought it was a good idea to load up on bonds for the past two years?
Every depositor received an FDIC insurance notice when opening an account. The bailout of the accounts with SBV is corruption at its finest.
You didn't actually expect that the federal government would allow SVB account holders to lose money, did you? Silicon Valley = Liberals = Democrats = 100% Federal Government backing.