Stormy Daniels sues Trump

[DC_Vol]

LOL.. You don't think he's billing?

LG, you care to weigh in here? I think the question is two fold.

1- are you doing any real work today?
2 - if so, are you billing hours to your clients? As a follow up, of yes, in what minute increments do you bill? 6 minutes?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

LG, you care to weigh in here? I think the question is two fold.

1- are you doing any real work today?
2 - if so, are you billing hours to your clients? As a follow up, of yes, in what minute increments do you bill? 6 minutes?

I actually heard one of our union lawyers once say that he started billing the moment he left his house when he went on the road. They bill when they take a dump. (Grabbed the paper and thought about your chances of winning your case.... billable) Why not? People pay it, because they have no proof it isn't legitimate.

 

[TennTom]

If by "getting it done" you mean an increase in the prices of washers, dryers, air conditioners, cars, smartphones, computers, toys, televisions, soybeans, corn, pork beef and higher inflation than yea he's getting it done alright. The bad thing is that the real pain won't hit the economy until the fall.

Just in time for the mid-terms. How is that bad?

 

[DC_Vol]

I actually heard one of our union lawyers once say that he started billing the moment he left his house when he went on the road. They bill when they take a dump. (Grabbed the paper and thought about your chances of winning your case.... billable) Why not? People pay it, because they have no proof it isn't legitimate.

Yeah I've for a family full of attorneys. I know how the racket works.

I also used to be a consultant.

 

[rjd970]

The 1980s called and wants their GOP social policy returned. You're long overdue.

Look, if you ask the vast majority of self identified conservatives and GOP members these days, most will tell you they could give a hootie darn who does what behind closed doors. The pathetic extreme minority are the ones making noise about it, but it gets attributed to everybody right of center in the political spectrum.

Or you can be like every other Democrat and cast a wide (and untrue) net over EVERYONE in the GOP hating:

People of color
Homosexuals
The Poor
Science
Any other religion than Christianity and Judaism.
Women (except to breed and stick around the kitchen)

I'm sure I've left a thing or two out. Please feel free to continue the list if you'd like.

Ironic post is ironic, lol.

I still think its an issue that guys like Ted Cruz and Huckabee still get traction and a platform. But, like I said before (and it agrees with your post btw) I certainly hope the sands are shifting like they seem to be over the last couple decades. I'm also glad to see posts like yours admitting the morality brigade is antiquated and pathetic.

I like a lot about the GOP platform (at least what they say) about governance...so show me a candidate that cares as much about legalizing pot, prostitution, and any other victimless imaginary moral crime and I'm 100% on board. But you can't sit there with a straight face and say those type issues get the same amount of opposition on the left as they do the right. It's just not true.

 

[Grand Vol]

Ironic post is ironic, lol.

I still think its an issue that guys like Ted Cruz and Huckabee still get traction and a platform. But, like I said before (and it agrees with your post btw) I certainly hope the sands are shifting like they seem to be over the last couple decades. I'm also glad to see posts like yours admitting the morality brigade is antiquated and pathetic.

I like a lot about the GOP platform (at least what they say) about governance...so show me a candidate that cares as much about legalizing pot, prostitution, and any other victimless imaginary moral crime and I'm 100% on board. But you can't sit there with a straight face and say those type issues get the same amount of opposition on the left as they do the right. It's just not true.

Here's the thing though, how many candidates are asked about the legalization question? Furthermore, who really cares that much?

People like Cruz and Huckabee have a following for other reasons as well. It isn't strictly about the religious right flocking to them. Loudest screechers and whatnot.

 

[T-TownVol]

The left better hope that the right does not come more to the center on social issues........

 

[volfanjustin]

Here's the thing though, how many candidates are asked about the legalization question? Furthermore, who really cares that much?

People like Cruz and Huckabee have a following for other reasons as well. It isn't strictly about the religious right flocking to them. Loudest screechers and whatnot.

I am/was a Ted Cruz fan voted for him in the primaries. I'm not really religious at all, I want most of these things decided at the state level.

 

[Grand Vol]

The left better hope that the right does not come more to the center on social issues........

Social issues haven't really been on the ticket for the past few Presidential elections. Name me one Republican running for President that made such a thing a central topic of discussion.

However, the stigma of 20-30 years ago is still brought up by Democrats. Hell, look at the Kavanaugh nomination and the craziness that's following that.

 

[T-TownVol]

Social issues haven't really been on the ticket for the past few Presidential elections. Name me one Republican running for President that made such a thing a central topic of discussion.

However, the stigma of 20-30 years ago is still brought up by Democrats. Hell, look at the Kavanaugh nomination and the craziness that's following that.

This is my point......when swing voters realize that the right is not the party of 20 years ago it is usually bad news for the left......

 

[Grand Vol]

This is my point......when swing voters realize that the right is not the party of 20 years ago it is usually bad news for the left......

Yeah, you might as well convince them Bigfoot is coming in sprinkling fairy dust while riding a unicorn.

 

[evillawyer]

What? Rudy lie? Never.

Twitter

 

[Sandman 423]

Just in time for the mid-terms. How is that bad?

So you hope something bad will happen to help elect the people you want?

Why note hope the people you want in office find a message that resonates with enough people to get voted in?

 

[McDad]

So you hope something bad will happen to help elect the people you want?

Why note hope the people you want in office find a message that resonates with enough people to get voted in?

The message of subjugation doesn't reasonate (at least for a little while longer).

 

[lawgator1]

LG, you care to weigh in here? I think the question is two fold.

1- are you doing any real work today?


Yes. An appellate brief.

Last week, I worked until midnight Wednesday night and the next day until 230 am, also on an appeal.


2 - if so, are you billing hours to your clients? As a follow up, of yes, in what minute increments do you bill? 6 minutes?

I do bill in tenths of an hour. Today will not be especially high. I think about 6.5 in total.

.

 

[Vol0725]

If by "getting it done" you mean an increase in the prices of washers, dryers, air conditioners, cars, smartphones, computers, toys, televisions, soybeans, corn, pork beef and higher inflation than yea he's getting it done alright. The bad thing is that the real pain won't hit the economy until the fall.

I respect your point.

By “getting it done” he has, which I know you support none of these I’m sure (lol): lower taxes, increased market portfolio wealth, record job growth, lowest minority unemployment records, less people on food stamps, significant GDP growth , decreased burdens of onerous regulations, increased consumer confidence etc etc.

Now just don't expect these historic achievements to interrupt programming of the Stormy Daniels soap opera that dominates today's mainstream media.

Lastly, I’m not gonna go down the tariff rabbit hole, but I will say the only reason he’s doing it is to show our trade partners he’ll take action, not use words. It’s about fair and reciprocal trade, over the long run it’ll work out in us getting better deals.

Here’s a yes/no on the tarriff topic that’s fairly good; of which I see both sides:

Are Trump’s tariffs a good idea? The arguments for and against | The Spectator

 

[rjd970]

Social issues haven't really been on the ticket for the past few Presidential elections. Name me one Republican running for President that made such a thing a central topic of discussion.

However, the stigma of 20-30 years ago is still brought up by Democrats. Hell, look at the Kavanaugh nomination and the craziness that's following that.

An agnostic, fiscally conservative, socially liberal, free market candidate is my ideal politician.

Basically, I'm pro-freedom.

 

[Septic]

An agnostic, fiscally conservative, socially liberal, free market candidate is my ideal politician.

Basically, I'm pro-freedom.

 

[TennTom]

One thing you can pretty much bank on. Trump and his stooges will start crucifying Michael Cohen in short order. Sh!t's about to go down.

 

[Squints]

One thing you can pretty much bank on. Trump and his stooges will start crucifying Michael Cohen in short order. Sh!t's about to go down.

It’s been running down the wall for two years now, how much longer do y’all need?

 

[TennTom]

It’s been running down the wall for two years now, how much longer do y’all need?

Was talking about a Cohen-Trump feud. Try to keep up, Squirts.

 

[Carl Pickens]

Did the playboy model thing happen while he was married?

John F Kennedy says it did

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

One thing you can pretty much bank on. Trump and his stooges will start crucifying Michael Cohen in short order. Sh!t's about to go down.

Why would I crucify Cohen? For wanting to tell the truth?

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

:loco: I didn't realize my home video had been leaked out.

 

[carlos86]

I respect your point.

By “getting it done” he has, which I know you support none of these I’m sure (lol): lower taxes, increased market portfolio wealth, record job growth, lowest minority unemployment records, less people on food stamps, significant GDP growth , decreased burdens of onerous regulations, increased consumer confidence etc etc.

Now just don't expect these historic achievements to interrupt programming of the Stormy Daniels soap opera that dominates today's mainstream media.

Lastly, I’m not gonna go down the tariff rabbit hole, but I will say the only reason he’s doing it is to show our trade partners he’ll take action, not use words. It’s about fair and reciprocal trade, over the long run it’ll work out in us getting better deals.

Here’s a yes/no on the tarriff topic that’s fairly good; of which I see both sides:

Are Trump’s tariffs a good idea? The arguments for and against | The Spectator

Those tax cuts were null and void the moment we entered a trade war with China, Canada and the EU. All the while China made a trade deal with Canada, the EU with Japan and they have all found ways to alienate us and ultimately outlast us while at the same time permanently damaging the U.S. economy.

"If all of the tariffs that have been proposed take effect, they would bring down long-run U.S. GDP by 0.47 percent — about $118 billion — in the long term and cost more than 364,000 jobs, a new analysis from the Tax Foundation shows."

Tariffs: Economic Impact on the U.S. | Weekly Tracker | Tax Foundation

Trump's new midterm threat: A trade war smacking voters - POLITICO